The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PHILOSOPHY OF ENGINEERING
    GREBER, H
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 1966, 3 (10) : 112 - &
  • [22] PHILOSOPHY AND ENGINEERING
    LEGGETT, RS
    JORDAN, GB
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 1967, 4 (01) : 126 - &
  • [23] Philosophy in engineering
    Atlan, Daniel
    RECHERCHE ET PRATIQUES PEDAGOGIQUES EN LANGUES DE SPECIALITE-CAHIERS DE L APLIUT, 2007, 26 (02): : 140 - 141
  • [24] A framework for measuring quality in engineering education
    Owlia, MS
    Aspinwall, EM
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 9 (06): : 501 - 518
  • [25] A new framework for engineering science education
    Richards, DE
    28TH ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1246 - 1246
  • [26] An Assessment Framework for Engineering Education Systems
    Rouvrais, Siegfried
    Lassudrie, Claire
    Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2014, 477 : 250 - 255
  • [27] Roles of Advances in Engineering Education and Journal of Engineering Education for the engineering education community
    Matusovich, Holly
    Benson, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2022, 111 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [28] Engineering and engineering education in Egypt
    El-Sayed, OL
    Lucena, J
    Downey, G
    IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2006, 25 (02) : 18 - 25
  • [29] Engineering and Engineering Technology Education
    Grinter, Linton E.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 31 (02): : 8 - 11
  • [30] Engineering and engineering technology education
    Grinter, Linton E., 1600, American Society for Engineering Education (31):