The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Philosophy of Engineering and Engineering Education
    Pena J, Gabriel
    REVISTA DIGITAL LAMPSAKOS, 2011, (05): : 37 - 40
  • [2] Measuring the Effects of Precollege Engineering Education
    Salzman, Noah
    Ohland, Matthew W.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [3] Educational Technologies for Precollege Engineering Education
    Riojas, Mario
    Lysecky, Susan
    Rozenblit, Jerzy
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 5 (01): : 20 - 37
  • [4] Engineering and Philosophy of Engineering
    Yin, Rui-yu
    Li, Bo-cong
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 1 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [5] PHILOSOPHY OF ENGINEERING-EDUCATION
    MYERS, BR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 1978, 21 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [6] Philosophy of Technology in Engineering Education
    McGrann, Roy T. R.
    FIE: 2008 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1810 - 1815
  • [7] Conceptual Change in Precollege Engineering
    Salzman, Noah
    Strobel, Johannes
    RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION SYMPOSIUM, 2011, : 487 - 498
  • [8] Special session - Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education?
    Heywood, John
    Smith, Karl A.
    McGrann, Roy
    2007 37TH ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, GLOBAL ENGINEERING : KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT BORDERS - OPPORTUNITIES WITHOUT PASSPORTS, VOLS 1- 4, 2007, : 101 - +
  • [10] HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION
    KEYES, DB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1953, 49 (12) : 635 - 640