Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and FilterWire neuroprotection: Single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes

被引:14
|
作者
Lin, Peter H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wei [2 ]
Guerrero, Marlon A. [2 ]
McCoy, Sally A. [2 ]
Felkaz, Deborah [2 ]
Kougias, Panos [2 ]
El Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dep Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
carotid artery stenting; distal protection device; high-risk patients; restenosis;
D O I
10.2310/6670.2006.00054
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Emerging data have supported the clinical efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in stroke prevention in high-risk surgical patients. This study was performed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcome of CAS using the Carotid Wallstent and FilterWire distal protection (both Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) at an academic institution. Risk factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) were also analyzed. Clinical variables and treatment outcome of high-risk patients who underwent Carotid Wallstent placement with FilterWire EX/EZ neuroprotection were analyzed during a recent 54-month period. Three hundred eighty CAS procedures were performed in 354 patients. Technical success was achieved in 372 cases (98%), and symptomatic lesions existed in 85 (24%) patients. No patient experienced periprocedural mortality or neuroprotective device-related complication. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 2.7%, and the overall complication rate was 6.9%. The overall major or fatal stroke rates in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were 4.6% and 1.3%, respectively (not significant). The overall stroke and death rates between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 5.8% and 2.4%, respectively (not significant). The median follow-up period was 29 months (range 1-53 months). With Kaplan-Meier analysis, the rates of freedom from 60% or greater ISR after CAS procedures at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,94%,92%, and 90%, respectively. The rates of freedom from all fatal and nonfatal strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,91%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. Multivariable analysis of significant univariate predictors identified that postendarterectomy stenosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.98, p = .02) and multiple stent placement (OR 3.68, p =.03) were independent predictors of ISR. Our study yielded favorable short-term and midterm clinical results using Carotid Wallstent with FilterWire neuroprotection. Late follow-up results showed low rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke and favorable ISR rates compared with other carotid stent trials. Postendarterectomy and multiple stent placement were associated with subsequent ISR.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: a single center experience
    Angioli, P.
    Porto, I.
    Liistro, F.
    Ducci, K.
    Falsini, G.
    Grotti, S.
    Turini, F.
    Ventoruzzo, G.
    Bellandi, G.
    Bolognese, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 244 - 244
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting: Experience of a single center
    Karaduman, Bilge Duran
    Ayhan, Huseyin
    Keles, Telat
    Bozkurt, Engin
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 48 (07): : 646 - 655
  • [43] Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single Center "Real World'' Experience
    Krasniqi, Nazmi
    Turgut, Michael
    Husmann, Marc
    Roffi, Marco
    Schwarz, Urs
    Greutmann, Matthias
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Amann, Beatrice
    Corti, Roberto
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [44] Feasibility and efficacy of balloon-based neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting in a single-center setting
    Schlüter, M
    Tübler, T
    Mathey, DG
    Schofer, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) : 890 - 895
  • [45] Clinical results of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterctomy; a single center experience
    Akinci, T.
    Derle, E.
    Kibaroglu, S.
    Ocal, R.
    Harman, A.
    Kural, F.
    Kilinc, M.
    Akay, H. T.
    Can, U.
    Benli, U. S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 : S83 - S83
  • [46] Clinical results of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterctomy; a single center experience
    Akinci, T.
    Derle, E.
    Kibaroglu, S.
    Ocal, R.
    Harman, A.
    Kural, F.
    Kilinc, M.
    Akay, H. T.
    Can, U.
    Benli, U. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 21 : 115 - 115
  • [47] Very Low Rate of New Brain Lesions After Vulnerable Carotid Artery Stenting Cases Using Only FilterWire EZ as Distal Embolic Protection
    Ishida, Atsushi
    Asakuno, Keizoh
    Shiramizu, Hideki
    Yoshimoto, Haruko
    Nakase, Ko
    Kato, Masataka
    Matsuo, Seigo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 141 : E145 - E150
  • [48] Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience using a Hybrid Procedure
    Xu, Rong-wei
    Liu, Peng
    Fan, Xue-qiang
    Wang, Qian
    Zhang, Jian-bin
    Ye, Zhi-dong
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 33 : 138 - 143
  • [49] Single-Center Cost Comparisons of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Carotid Stenting
    Lajos, Paul S.
    Bangiyev, Ronald
    Eslami, Mohammad H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : E204 - E204
  • [50] Filters and balloons distal protection devices provide similar neuroprotection in carotid artery stenting.
    Weisz, G
    Iyer, SS
    Vitek, JJ
    Brennan, C
    Dangas, G
    New, G
    Roubin, GS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (6A): : 50L - 50L