Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and FilterWire neuroprotection: Single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes

被引:14
|
作者
Lin, Peter H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wei [2 ]
Guerrero, Marlon A. [2 ]
McCoy, Sally A. [2 ]
Felkaz, Deborah [2 ]
Kougias, Panos [2 ]
El Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dep Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
carotid artery stenting; distal protection device; high-risk patients; restenosis;
D O I
10.2310/6670.2006.00054
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Emerging data have supported the clinical efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in stroke prevention in high-risk surgical patients. This study was performed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcome of CAS using the Carotid Wallstent and FilterWire distal protection (both Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) at an academic institution. Risk factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) were also analyzed. Clinical variables and treatment outcome of high-risk patients who underwent Carotid Wallstent placement with FilterWire EX/EZ neuroprotection were analyzed during a recent 54-month period. Three hundred eighty CAS procedures were performed in 354 patients. Technical success was achieved in 372 cases (98%), and symptomatic lesions existed in 85 (24%) patients. No patient experienced periprocedural mortality or neuroprotective device-related complication. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 2.7%, and the overall complication rate was 6.9%. The overall major or fatal stroke rates in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were 4.6% and 1.3%, respectively (not significant). The overall stroke and death rates between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 5.8% and 2.4%, respectively (not significant). The median follow-up period was 29 months (range 1-53 months). With Kaplan-Meier analysis, the rates of freedom from 60% or greater ISR after CAS procedures at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,94%,92%, and 90%, respectively. The rates of freedom from all fatal and nonfatal strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,91%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. Multivariable analysis of significant univariate predictors identified that postendarterectomy stenosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.98, p = .02) and multiple stent placement (OR 3.68, p =.03) were independent predictors of ISR. Our study yielded favorable short-term and midterm clinical results using Carotid Wallstent with FilterWire neuroprotection. Late follow-up results showed low rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke and favorable ISR rates compared with other carotid stent trials. Postendarterectomy and multiple stent placement were associated with subsequent ISR.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective single-center analysis
    Cho, Jeong Su
    Song, Seunghwan
    Huh, Up
    Lee, Chung Won
    Lee, Jae Il
    Ko, Jun Kyeung
    Lee, Tea Hong
    Hwangbo, Lee
    Sung, Sang Min
    Cho, Han Jin
    Kim, Gwon-Min
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, : 3409 - 3416
  • [32] Carotid Artery Stenting in Acute Stroke Using a Microporous Stent Device: A Single-Center Experience
    Lamanna, Anthony
    Maingard, Julian
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Barras, Christen
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Thijs, Vincent
    Chandra, Ronil
    Brooks, Duncan Mark
    Asadi, Hamed
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E1003 - E1012
  • [33] Common Carotid Artery Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience in 40 Cases
    Belczak, Sergio
    Mulatti, Grace Carvajal
    Abrao, Sergio Ricardo
    da Silva, Erasmo Simao
    Aun, Ricardo
    Puech-Leao, Pedro
    de Luccia, Nelson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [34] Carotid Wallstent Versus Roadsaver Stent and Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting
    Montorsi, Piero
    Caputi, Luigi
    Galli, Stefano
    Ravagnani, Paolo M.
    Teruzzi, Giovanni
    Annoni, Andrea
    Calligaris, Giuseppe
    Fabbiocchi, Franco
    Trabattoni, Daniela
    de Martini, Stefano
    Grancini, Luca
    Pontone, Gianluca
    Andreini, Daniele
    Troiano, Sarah
    Restelli, Davide
    Bartorelli, Antonio L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (04) : 403 - 414
  • [35] The impact of post-dilatation on periprocedural outcomes during carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience
    Besli, Feyzullah
    Gungoren, Fatih
    Kocaturk, Ozcan
    Tanriverdi, Zulkif
    Tascanov, Mustafa Begenc
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2019, 290 : 74 - 79
  • [36] Carotid stenting in patients older than 65 years with inoperable carotid artery disease: A single-center experience
    Gupta, A
    Bhatia, A
    Ahuja, A
    Shalev, Y
    Bajwa, T
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 50 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [37] A single-center experience of carotid artery stenting by a single operator in a tertiary care setting in Pakistan
    Raja, Avais
    Hassan, Ayesha
    Manzoor, Hana
    Masud, Fadia
    Hassan, Yusuf
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 41 (03): : 283 - 286
  • [38] Applicability of Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients 80 Years or Older: A Single-Center Experience
    Abiko, Masaru
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Ochiai, Junichiro
    Yamada, Naoto
    Kuroki, Kazuhiko
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 : E323 - E327
  • [39] Single-center experience with balloon-protected carotid artery stenting in 98 patients
    Schlueter, M
    Tuebler, T
    Haufe, MC
    Mathey, DG
    Schofer, J
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 368 - 368
  • [40] P5.19 Transradial Approach for Carotid Artery Stenting: Single-Center Experience
    Damian Maciejewski
    Lukasz Tekieli
    Anna Kablak-Ziembicka
    Piotr Paluszek
    Mariusz Trystula
    Karolina Dzierwa
    Magdalena Wojcik-Pedziwiatr
    Roman Machnik
    Grzegorz Lewinski
    Piotr Pieniazek
    Artery Research, 2015, 12 (1) : 24 - 24