Testosterone does not improve ovarian response in Bologna poor responders: a randomized controlled trial (TESTOPRIM)

被引:6
|
作者
Subira, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Algaba, Anna [1 ]
Vazquez, Sheila [1 ]
Taroncher Dasi, Roser [1 ]
Molla Robles, Guillermo [3 ]
Monzo Fabuel, Susana [1 ]
Baydal, Virginia [1 ]
Ruiz Herreros, Amparo [1 ]
Garcia Camunas, Nuria [1 ]
Rubio Rubio, Jose Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp La Fe, Reprod Med Res Grp, Assisted Reprod Unit, Spanish Clin Res Network SCReN, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza Policia Local 3, Valencia 46015, Spain
[3] IVI Fdn, Edificio Biopolo, Valencia 46026, Spain
关键词
Follicular priming; IVF; Mature oocytes; Poor ovarian response; Testosterone; TRANSDERMAL TESTOSTERONE; IVF PATIENTS; GONADOTROPINS; PRETREATMENT; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Does testosterone, either in a long or short course, before IVF increase the number of mature oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian response? Design: Single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Poor ovarian response is defined according to Bologna criteria. Sixty-three participants were included and assigned to three arms: group 1 (long testosterone [n = 17]) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 56 days before ovarian stimulation; group 2 (short testosterone [n = 161) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 10 days before ovarian stimulation; and group 3 (control, no intervention). Primary outcome was number of mature oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included other cycle parameters (duration of stimulation, antral follicle count, number of follicles >16 mm, total oocytes retrieved and testosterone levels). Results: The number of mature oocytes retrieved did not differ between the three groups (2.16, 2.71 and 2.91, P = 0.719, groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). No other significant differences were found in the remaining cycle parameters, except for testosterone levels at the beginning of ovarian stimulation, which were higher in both testosterone groups and relatively higher in group 2 (1.67 and 3.03, respectively versus 0.14 control group, P = 0.01). A Poisson regression model showed no significant differences for the primary outcome (group 3 versus group 2: 0.925, 95% CI 0.572 to 1.508, P = 0.753; group 3 versus group 1: 0.873, 95% CI 0.534 to 1.426, P = 0.587). Conclusions: The use of testosterone, even when applied for a prolonged period, does not improve the number of mature oocytes in poor ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 474
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does PGT improve outcomes in poor responders?
    Ginsburg, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [32] THE EFFECT OF ORAL TESTOSTERONE UNDECANOATE THERAPY ON CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION AND IVF OUTCOME IN POOR RESPONDERS
    Mskhalaya, G.
    Eltsova, E.
    Zaletova, V.
    Lubimkina, E.
    Kalinchenko, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E109 - E109
  • [33] Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration before in vitro fertilization on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria: A randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Ze
    Yang, Aijun
    Bao, Hongchu
    Wang, Ancong
    Deng, Xiaohui
    Xue, Dena
    Tan, Huifang
    Zhou, Yi
    Wu, Chuanye
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    Shi, Yuhua
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (07) : 1030 - 1038
  • [34] The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Massin, N.
    Abdennebi, I
    Porcu-Buisson, G.
    Chevalier, N.
    Descat, E.
    Pietin-Vialle, C.
    Goro, S.
    Brussieux, M.
    Pinto, M.
    Pasquier, M.
    Bry-Gauillard, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (05) : 927 - 937
  • [35] The impact of total follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose on outcomes in ESHRE Bologna poor ovarian responders. A post-hoc analysis of the ESPART randomized controlled trial
    Hubbard, J.
    Chin, W.
    Humaidan, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 36 - 37
  • [36] Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Man Di
    Xiaohong Wang
    Jing Wu
    Hongya Yang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 1713 - 1726
  • [37] Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria
    Hu, Linli
    Bu, Zhiqin
    Guo, Yihong
    Su, Yingchun
    Zhai, Jun
    Sun, Yingpu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (04): : 1128 - 1134
  • [38] Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Di, Man
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Wu, Jing
    Yang, Hongya
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (06) : 1713 - 1726
  • [39] Transdermal testosterone pre-treatment in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized clinical trial
    Bosdou, J. K.
    Kolibianakis, E. M.
    Venetis, C. A.
    Dafopoulos, K.
    Zepiridis, L.
    Chatzimeletiou, K.
    Makedos, A.
    Anifandis, G.
    Messini, C. I.
    Daniilidis, A.
    Mitsoli, A.
    Savvaidou, D.
    Messinis, I. E.
    Tarlatzis, B. C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 95 - 95
  • [40] The effect of intra-ovarian androgen priming on ovarian reserve parameters in Bologna poor responders
    Lan Ngoc Vuong
    Ho, Tuong M.
    Ha, Anh N.
    Pham, Toan D.
    Le, Tam T. N.
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    Humaidan, Peter
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (02) : 223 - 228