Testosterone does not improve ovarian response in Bologna poor responders: a randomized controlled trial (TESTOPRIM)

被引:6
|
作者
Subira, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Algaba, Anna [1 ]
Vazquez, Sheila [1 ]
Taroncher Dasi, Roser [1 ]
Molla Robles, Guillermo [3 ]
Monzo Fabuel, Susana [1 ]
Baydal, Virginia [1 ]
Ruiz Herreros, Amparo [1 ]
Garcia Camunas, Nuria [1 ]
Rubio Rubio, Jose Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp La Fe, Reprod Med Res Grp, Assisted Reprod Unit, Spanish Clin Res Network SCReN, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza Policia Local 3, Valencia 46015, Spain
[3] IVI Fdn, Edificio Biopolo, Valencia 46026, Spain
关键词
Follicular priming; IVF; Mature oocytes; Poor ovarian response; Testosterone; TRANSDERMAL TESTOSTERONE; IVF PATIENTS; GONADOTROPINS; PRETREATMENT; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Does testosterone, either in a long or short course, before IVF increase the number of mature oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian response? Design: Single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Poor ovarian response is defined according to Bologna criteria. Sixty-three participants were included and assigned to three arms: group 1 (long testosterone [n = 17]) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 56 days before ovarian stimulation; group 2 (short testosterone [n = 161) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 10 days before ovarian stimulation; and group 3 (control, no intervention). Primary outcome was number of mature oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included other cycle parameters (duration of stimulation, antral follicle count, number of follicles >16 mm, total oocytes retrieved and testosterone levels). Results: The number of mature oocytes retrieved did not differ between the three groups (2.16, 2.71 and 2.91, P = 0.719, groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). No other significant differences were found in the remaining cycle parameters, except for testosterone levels at the beginning of ovarian stimulation, which were higher in both testosterone groups and relatively higher in group 2 (1.67 and 3.03, respectively versus 0.14 control group, P = 0.01). A Poisson regression model showed no significant differences for the primary outcome (group 3 versus group 2: 0.925, 95% CI 0.572 to 1.508, P = 0.753; group 3 versus group 1: 0.873, 95% CI 0.534 to 1.426, P = 0.587). Conclusions: The use of testosterone, even when applied for a prolonged period, does not improve the number of mature oocytes in poor ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 474
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Therapeutic effect of prolonged testosterone pretreatment in women with poor ovarian response: A randomized control trial
    Hoang, Quoc Huy
    Ho, Hung Sy
    Do, Huong Thuy
    Nguyen, Tien Viet
    Nguyen, Hong Phuong
    Le, Minh Tam
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 20 (03) : 305 - 312
  • [22] Does the addition of growth hormone to the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection antagonist protocol improve outcomes in poor responders? A randomized, controlled trial
    Bassiouny, Yasmin Ahmed
    Dakhly, Dina Mohamed Refaat
    Bayoumi, Yomna Ali
    Hashish, Nawara Mohamed
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (03) : 697 - 702
  • [23] Start stop protocol: A preliminary study of a new controlled ovarian stimulation method for Bologna poor responders
    Yilmaz, B.
    Gulec, E. S.
    Suleyman, A.
    Kose, C.
    Isik, A. Z.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 449 - 449
  • [24] Growth hormone alleviates oxidative stress and improves the IVF outcomes of poor ovarian responders: a randomized controlled trial
    Gong, Yan
    Zhang, Kun
    Xiong, Dongsheng
    Wei, Jiajing
    Tan, Hao
    Qin, Shengfang
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [25] Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Llacer, Joaquin
    Moliner, Belen
    Luque, Lydia
    Bernabeu, Andrea
    Lledo, Belen
    Carlos Castillo, Juan
    Guerrero, Jaime
    Ten, Jorge
    Bernabeu, Rafael
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [26] Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Joaquín Llácer
    Belén Moliner
    Lydia Luque
    Andrea Bernabéu
    Belén Lledó
    Juan Carlos Castillo
    Jaime Guerrero
    Jorge Ten
    Rafael Bernabéu
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 18
  • [27] Growth hormone alleviates oxidative stress and improves the IVF outcomes of poor ovarian responders: a randomized controlled trial
    Yan Gong
    Kun Zhang
    Dongsheng Xiong
    Jiajing Wei
    Hao Tan
    Shengfang Qin
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 18
  • [28] Quality of life and Sexual Dysfunction in Bologna poor ovarian responders (POR)
    Hernandez Hernandez, M.
    Garcia, S.
    Martinez, F.
    Polyzos, N. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I426 - I426
  • [29] IVF results following transdermal testosterone in poor responders according bologna criteria
    Fabregues, F.
    Iraola, A.
    Casals, G.
    Creus, M.
    Peralta, S.
    Penarrubia, J.
    Manau, D.
    Civico, S.
    Balasch, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 311 - 311
  • [30] Follicular activation in women previously diagnosed with poor ovarian response: a randomized, controlled trial
    Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
    Herraiz, Sonia
    Pamplona, Loida
    Subira, Jessica
    Jose Soriano, Maria
    Simon, Carlos
    Seli, Emre
    Pellicer, Antonio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (04) : 747 - 755