Testosterone does not improve ovarian response in Bologna poor responders: a randomized controlled trial (TESTOPRIM)

被引:6
|
作者
Subira, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Algaba, Anna [1 ]
Vazquez, Sheila [1 ]
Taroncher Dasi, Roser [1 ]
Molla Robles, Guillermo [3 ]
Monzo Fabuel, Susana [1 ]
Baydal, Virginia [1 ]
Ruiz Herreros, Amparo [1 ]
Garcia Camunas, Nuria [1 ]
Rubio Rubio, Jose Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp La Fe, Reprod Med Res Grp, Assisted Reprod Unit, Spanish Clin Res Network SCReN, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza Policia Local 3, Valencia 46015, Spain
[3] IVI Fdn, Edificio Biopolo, Valencia 46026, Spain
关键词
Follicular priming; IVF; Mature oocytes; Poor ovarian response; Testosterone; TRANSDERMAL TESTOSTERONE; IVF PATIENTS; GONADOTROPINS; PRETREATMENT; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Does testosterone, either in a long or short course, before IVF increase the number of mature oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian response? Design: Single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Poor ovarian response is defined according to Bologna criteria. Sixty-three participants were included and assigned to three arms: group 1 (long testosterone [n = 17]) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 56 days before ovarian stimulation; group 2 (short testosterone [n = 161) 12.5 mg/day testosterone gel for 10 days before ovarian stimulation; and group 3 (control, no intervention). Primary outcome was number of mature oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included other cycle parameters (duration of stimulation, antral follicle count, number of follicles >16 mm, total oocytes retrieved and testosterone levels). Results: The number of mature oocytes retrieved did not differ between the three groups (2.16, 2.71 and 2.91, P = 0.719, groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). No other significant differences were found in the remaining cycle parameters, except for testosterone levels at the beginning of ovarian stimulation, which were higher in both testosterone groups and relatively higher in group 2 (1.67 and 3.03, respectively versus 0.14 control group, P = 0.01). A Poisson regression model showed no significant differences for the primary outcome (group 3 versus group 2: 0.925, 95% CI 0.572 to 1.508, P = 0.753; group 3 versus group 1: 0.873, 95% CI 0.534 to 1.426, P = 0.587). Conclusions: The use of testosterone, even when applied for a prolonged period, does not improve the number of mature oocytes in poor ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 474
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testosterone priming (short or long course) before IVF does not improve the number of oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian responders: a randomized controlled trial
    Subira, I.
    Algaba, A.
    Vazquez, S.
    Taroncher Dasi, R.
    Month Fabuel, S.
    Baydal, V.
    Ruiz Herreros, A.
    Garcia Camunas, N.
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 7 - 7
  • [2] THE ESPART RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS ALIGNED WITH THE BOLOGNA CRITERIA: A POST HOC SUBGROUP ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO POOR OVARIAN RESPONSE INCLUSION CRITERIA.
    Hubbard, J.
    Chin, W.
    Humaidan, P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E191 - E191
  • [3] Does dehydroepiandrosterone improve pregnancy rate in women undergoing IVF/ICSI with expected poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria? A randomized controlled trial
    Kotb, Mohamed M. M.
    Hassan, AbdelGany M. A.
    AwadAllah, Ahmed M. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 200 : 11 - 15
  • [4] Results of the ESPART randomized controlled trial investigating recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation for controlled ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders aligned with the Bologna criteria
    Humaidan, P.
    Chin, W.
    Rogoff, D.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 15 - 16
  • [5] A randomized, controlled, pilot trial on the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on ovarian response markers, ovarian response, and in vitro fertilization outcomes in poor responders
    Yeung, Tracy Wing Yee
    Chai, Joyce
    Li, Raymond Hang Wun
    Lee, Vivian Chi Yan
    Ho, Pak Chung
    Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (01) : 108 - +
  • [6] Acupuncture for Poor Ovarian Response: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Jihyun
    Lee, Hoyoung
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Kim, Joong Il
    Kang, Byoung-Kab
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Joo, Jong Kil
    Lee, Kyu Sup
    You, Sooseong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [7] FOLLICULAR ACTIVATION IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS (FAPPOR): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
    Herraiz, Sonia
    Pamplona, Loida
    Subira, Jessica
    Jose Soriano, Maria
    Simon, Carlos
    Seli, Emre
    Pellicer, Antonio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E425 - E426
  • [8] Does the “delayed start” protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial
    Mahnaz Ashrafi
    Arezoo Arabipoor
    Azar Yahyaei
    Zahra Zolfaghari
    Firouzah Ghaffari
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16
  • [9] Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Arabipoor, Arezoo
    Yahyaei, Azar
    Zolfaghari, Zahra
    Ghaffari, Firouzah
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [10] Use of intraovarian platelet rich plasma does not increase the ovarian reserve markers,ovarian response or IVF outcome in Bologna poor responders
    Singh, S.
    Singh, S.
    Ashraf, N.
    Basheer, R.
    Ashraf, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 37 - 38