Are multimetabolite methods fit-for-purpose for supporting toxicology studies?

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, Graeme [1 ]
机构
[1] Huntingdon Life Sci, Dept Bioanal, Huntingdon PE28 4HS, Cambs, England
关键词
metabolites; safety testing; toxicology;
D O I
10.4155/BIO.11.249
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The measurement of parent drug in biological samples is an integral part of the drug-development process from discovery support through to late phase clinical development. At some point during this process it may also be necessary to measure metabolites of the drug. The regulatory guidelines on metabolite safety testing outline metabolite exposure data that is required to support drug registration. There are also a number of publications that describe strategies for validating bioanalytical methods used to quantify metabolites based on the development status of the drug. Despite current regulatory and scientific thinking on this subject, there still seems to be a consensus in parts of the industry that drug metabolites should be measured whenever possible, provided that it is technically feasible to do so, rather than basing this decision on the development requirements of the drug. One consequence of this strategy is that often several metabolites are quantified when supporting early development studies (e.g., regulatory toxicology studies) using bioanalytical methods that have been fully validated to measure all the metabolites. This approach may be regarded as a questionable use of resources at a time when a more targeted approach to drug-development is probably a better option.
引用
收藏
页码:2701 / 2704
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fit-for-purpose Land Administration for Sustainable Development
    Enemark, Stig
    [J]. GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2016, 30 (08): : 16 - 19
  • [22] IS THE TREATMENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MEDICATION FIT-FOR-PURPOSE?: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
    Rodriguez-Leboeuf, A. M.
    Palmer, A.
    Gemmen, E.
    Williams, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S234 - S234
  • [23] A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment
    Meek, M. E. Bette
    Bolger, Michael
    Bus, James S.
    Christopher, John
    Conolly, Rory B.
    Lewis, R. Jeffrey
    Paolini, Gregory M.
    Schoeny, Rita
    Haber, Lynne T.
    Rosenstein, Amy B.
    Dourson, Michael L.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 66 (02) : 234 - 240
  • [24] Fit-for-Purpose Mycotoxin Methods Using Rapid and LC-MS Techniques
    Zhang, Kai
    Trucksess, Mary W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 101 (03) : 607 - 608
  • [25] Best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods: a conference report
    Joel Mathews
    Lakshmi Amaravadi
    Steven Eck
    Lauren Stevenson
    Yow-Ming C. Wang
    Viswanath Devanarayan
    John Allinson
    Kelly Lundsten
    Michele Gunsior
    Yan G. Ni
    Marc-Olivier Pepin
    Audrey Gagnon
    Curtis Sheldon
    Paul C. Trampont
    Virginia Litwin
    [J]. AAPS Open, 8 (1)
  • [26] Reference materials: are they fit-for-purpose for food analysis?
    Franz Ulberth
    Hendrik Emons
    [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2005, 381 : 99 - 101
  • [27] Improved quantification of fit-for-purpose saturation exponents
    Worthington, PF
    [J]. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2004, 7 (04) : 270 - 284
  • [28] Invited Perspective: The Promise of Fit-for-Purpose Systematic Evidence Maps for Supporting Regulatory Health Assessment
    Pelch, Katherine E.
    Kwiatkowski, Carol F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 130 (05)
  • [29] Toward fit-for-purpose certification of road additives
    Jones, D
    [J]. EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-VOLUME ROADS 2003, VOLS 1 AND 2: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION; ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT; DESIGN; MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE; OPERATIONS AND SAFETY, 2003, (1819): : A208 - A217
  • [30] Is the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication fit-for-purpose? A mixed-methods approach
    Rodriguez-Leboeuf, Ana Maria
    Williams, Paul
    Palmer, Alexandra
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S140 - S140