A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment

被引:15
|
作者
Meek, M. E. Bette [1 ]
Bolger, Michael [2 ]
Bus, James S. [3 ]
Christopher, John [4 ]
Conolly, Rory B. [5 ]
Lewis, R. Jeffrey [6 ]
Paolini, Gregory M. [7 ]
Schoeny, Rita [8 ]
Haber, Lynne T. [9 ]
Rosenstein, Amy B. [10 ]
Dourson, Michael L. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, McLaughlin Ctr Populat Hlth Risk Assessment, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] US FDA, Ctr Food Safety & Appl Nutr, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] Dow Chem Co USA, Toxicol & Environm Res & Consulting, Midland, MI 48674 USA
[4] Independent Consultant, Elk Grove, CA 95757 USA
[5] US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[6] ExxonMobil Biomed Sci, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA
[7] Risk Sci Int, Ottawa, ON K1N 7G2, Canada
[8] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[9] Toxicol Excellence Risk Assessment, Cincinnati, OH 45211 USA
[10] Independent Consultant, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
关键词
Mode of action; Fit-for-purpose; Problem formulation; Framework; Tier; Endogenous; Methods compendium; TO-OUTCOME MODEL; DIETARY EXPOSURES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.012
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two broad elements: improving technical analysis and utility for decision making. To advance the discussions in the NRC report, in three multi-stakeholder workshops organized by the Alliance for Risk Assessment, available and evolving risk assessment methodologies were considered through the development and application of case studies. A key product was a framework (http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Framework/ProblemFormulation.html) to guide risk assessors and managers to various dose-response assessment methods relevant to a range of decision contexts ranging from priority setting to full assessment, as illustrated by case studies. It is designed to facilitate selection of appropriate methodology for a variety of problem formulations and includes a variety of methods with supporting case studies, for areas flagged specifically by the NRC committee for consideration - e.g., susceptible sub-populations, population variability and background. The framewok contributes to organization and communication about methodologies for incorporating increasingly biologically informed and chemical specific knowledge into dose-response analysis, which is considered critical in evolving fit-for-purpose assessment to address relevant problem formulations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 240
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Structured Process to Identify Fit-For-Purpose Data: A Data Feasibility Assessment Framework
    Gatto, Nicolle M.
    Campbell, Ulka B.
    Rubinstein, Emily
    Jaksa, Ashley
    Mattox, Pattra
    Mo, Jingping
    Reynolds, Robert F.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 111 (01) : 122 - 134
  • [2] Fit-for-Purpose VSI Modelling Framework for Process Simulation
    Grunditz, Simon
    Asbjornsson, Gauti
    Hulthen, Erik
    Evertsson, Magnus
    [J]. MINERALS, 2021, 11 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] A codesigned fit-for-purpose implementation framework for aged care
    Meyer, Claudia
    Ogrin, Rajna
    Golenko, Xanthe
    Cyarto, Elizabeth
    Paine, Kath
    Walsh, Willeke
    Hutchinson, Alison
    Lowthian, Judy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (03) : 421 - 435
  • [4] Fit-for-purpose sampling
    Moy, Corrine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 57 (03) : 491 - 494
  • [5] Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational
    Rijke, Jeroen
    Brown, Rebekah
    Zevenbergen, Chris
    Ashley, Richard
    Farrelly, Megan
    Morison, Peter
    van Herk, Sebastiaan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 22 : 73 - 84
  • [6] A framework for a fit-for-purpose evaluation of non-animal methods
    Boobis, A. R.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S17 - S17
  • [7] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Torlakovic, Emina Emilia
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [8] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Emina Emilia Torlakovic
    [J]. Endocrine Pathology, 2018, 29 : 199 - 205
  • [9] The practicalities of a 'fit-for-purpose' validation
    Burton, Neil K.
    Wood, Stephen A.
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (21) : 2735 - 2740
  • [10] Fit-for-purpose Land Administration
    Enemark, Stig
    [J]. GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2013, 27 (07): : 26 - 29