Are multimetabolite methods fit-for-purpose for supporting toxicology studies?

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, Graeme [1 ]
机构
[1] Huntingdon Life Sci, Dept Bioanal, Huntingdon PE28 4HS, Cambs, England
关键词
metabolites; safety testing; toxicology;
D O I
10.4155/BIO.11.249
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The measurement of parent drug in biological samples is an integral part of the drug-development process from discovery support through to late phase clinical development. At some point during this process it may also be necessary to measure metabolites of the drug. The regulatory guidelines on metabolite safety testing outline metabolite exposure data that is required to support drug registration. There are also a number of publications that describe strategies for validating bioanalytical methods used to quantify metabolites based on the development status of the drug. Despite current regulatory and scientific thinking on this subject, there still seems to be a consensus in parts of the industry that drug metabolites should be measured whenever possible, provided that it is technically feasible to do so, rather than basing this decision on the development requirements of the drug. One consequence of this strategy is that often several metabolites are quantified when supporting early development studies (e.g., regulatory toxicology studies) using bioanalytical methods that have been fully validated to measure all the metabolites. This approach may be regarded as a questionable use of resources at a time when a more targeted approach to drug-development is probably a better option.
引用
收藏
页码:2701 / 2704
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathway Based Toxicology and Fit-for-Purpose Assays
    Clewell, Rebecca A.
    McMullen, Patrick D.
    Adeleye, Yeyejide
    Carmichael, Paul L.
    Andersen, Melvin E.
    [J]. VALIDATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR TOXICITY TESTING, 2016, 856 : 205 - 230
  • [2] Fit-for-purpose sampling
    Moy, Corrine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 57 (03) : 491 - 494
  • [3] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Torlakovic, Emina Emilia
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [4] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Emina Emilia Torlakovic
    [J]. Endocrine Pathology, 2018, 29 : 199 - 205
  • [5] The practicalities of a 'fit-for-purpose' validation
    Burton, Neil K.
    Wood, Stephen A.
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (21) : 2735 - 2740
  • [6] Structural characterization methods for biosimilars: fit-for-purpose, qualified or validated
    Easton, Richard L.
    [J]. GABI JOURNAL-GENERICS AND BIOSIMILARS INITIATIVE JOURNAL, 2022, 11 (01): : 41 - 44
  • [7] Fit-for-purpose Land Administration
    Enemark, Stig
    [J]. GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2013, 27 (07): : 26 - 29
  • [8] Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration
    不详
    [J]. GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2014, 28 (05): : 33 - 33
  • [9] A framework for a fit-for-purpose evaluation of non-animal methods
    Boobis, A. R.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S17 - S17
  • [10] Costs and benefits of fit-for-purpose solutions
    Bruce, T.
    Minnitt, R. C. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2022, 122 (07) : 413 - 420