Comparison of chemistry analytes between 2 portable, commercially available analyzers and a conventional laboratory analyzer in reptiles

被引:25
|
作者
McCain, Stephanie L. [2 ]
Flatland, Bente [1 ]
Schumacher, Juergen P. [2 ]
Clarke, Elsburgh O., III [2 ,3 ]
Fry, Michael M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Coll Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Vet Med, Dept Small Anim Clin Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
Clinical chemistry; i-STAT; method comparison; point-of-care; reptile; VetScan; CLINICAL ANALYZER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1939-165X.2010.00258.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background Advantages of handheld and small bench-top biochemical analyzers include requirements for smaller sample volume and practicality for use in the field or in practices, but little has been published on the performance of these instruments compared with standard reference methods in analysis of reptilian blood. Objective The aim of this study was to compare reptilian blood biochemical values obtained using the Abaxis VetScan Classic bench-top analyzer and a Heska i-STAT handheld analyzer with values obtained using a Roche Hitachi 911 chemical analyzer. Methods Reptiles, including 14 bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps), 4 blue-tongued skinks (Tiliqua gigas), 8 Burmese star tortoises (Geochelone platynota), 10 Indian star tortoises (Geochelone elegans), 5 red-tailed boas (Boa constrictor), and 5 Northern pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus), were manually restrained, and a single blood sample was obtained and divided for analysis. Results for concentrations of albumin, bile acids, calcium, glucose, phosphates, potassium, sodium, total protein, and uric acid and activities of aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase obtained from the VetScan Classic and Hitachi 911 were compared. Results for concentrations of chloride, glucose, potassium, and sodium obtained from the i-STAT and Hitachi 911 were compared. Results Compared with results from the Hitachi 911, those from the VetScan Classic and i-STAT had variable correlations, and constant or proportional bias was found for many analytes. Bile acid data could not be evaluated because results for 44 of 45 samples fell below the lower linearity limit of the VetScan Classic. Conclusions Although the 2 portable instruments might provide measurements with clinical utility, there were significant differences compared with the reference analyzer, and development of analyzer-specific reference intervals is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 479
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparison of portable and conventional laboratory analyzers for biochemical tests in chickens
    Ruiz-Jimenez, Fernando
    Gruber, Erika
    Correa, Maria
    Crespo, Rocio
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (02) : 746 - 754
  • [2] Comparison of a commercially available veterinary digital refractometer to analogue refractometer and laboratory chemistry analyzer in the evaluation of canine serum total protein
    Carignan, Katie
    Thevelein, Britt A. L.
    Brainard, Benjamin M.
    Koenig, Amie
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 261 (09):
  • [3] SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RHINOMANOMETERS
    DINIS, PB
    GUERRA, JB
    GOMES, A
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1994, 114 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [4] Blood Gas, Oxygen Saturation, pH, and Lactate Values in Elasmobranch Blood Measured with a Commercially Available Portable Clinical Analyzer and Standard Laboratory Instruments
    Gallagher, Austin J.
    Frick, Lorenz H.
    Bushnell, Peter G.
    Brill, Richard W.
    Mandelman, John W.
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH, 2010, 22 (04) : 229 - 234
  • [5] Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Microbial Quality between Commercially Available Organic and Conventional Japanese Soy Sauces
    Gientka, Iwona
    Synowiec, Alicja
    Roszko, Marek
    Nguyen, Cac Ngo Khoa
    Pobiega, Katarzyna
    Kot, Anna M.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [6] A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ACTIVATORS FOR DETERMINING THE PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME
    SMITH, LG
    KITCHENS, CS
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1985, 109 (03) : 243 - 246
  • [7] COMPARISON OF 2 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TEST METHODS WITH CONVENTIONAL COAGULASE TESTS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    JUNGKIND, DL
    TORHAN, NJ
    CORMAN, KE
    BONDI, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (02) : 191 - 193
  • [8] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PCA PUMPS AND CONVENTIONAL ANALGESIC THERAPY FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    HECKER, BR
    ALBERT, L
    PAIN, 1988, 35 (01) : 115 - 120
  • [9] Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for In Vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories
    Lieberman, Joshua A.
    Pepper, Gregory
    Naccache, Samia N.
    Huang, Meei-Li
    Jerome, Keith R.
    Greninger, Alexander L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [10] Search for cytomegalovirus-specific immunoglobulin M: Comparison between a new Western blot, conventional Western blot, and nine commercially available assays
    Lazzarotto, T
    Brojanac, S
    Maine, GT
    Landini, MP
    CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 4 (04) : 483 - 486