Impact of Dietary Meat and Animal Products on GHG Footprints: The UK and the US

被引:20
|
作者
Barthelmie, Rebecca J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sibley Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
carbon footprint; diet; carbon dioxide emissions; agriculture; livestock; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; LIVESTOCK; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; CLIMATE; TRENDS; FOODS;
D O I
10.3390/cli10030043
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the similar to 30+ billion animals consumed as food each year contribute similar to 14-16% of the global total. The aim of this research is to determine the contribution of meat and animal products to individual GHG footprints. Top-down estimates of GHG emissions from each livestock species are determined using livestock numbers, types, and region-specific emission factors. Comparing livestock emissions with those from individual countries, cattle rank as the third largest emitter after China and the United States (US). The largest uncertainty in these emissions calculations is in the range of emissions factors. Global top-down calculations indicate that the per capita GHG footprint from livestock emissions alone are approximately 1 tCO(2e)yr(-1). For the United Kingdom (UK) and the US, the calculated GHG livestock-related footprints are 1.1 tCO(2e)yr(-1) and 1.6 tCO(2e)yr(-1) per person, respectively. Bottom-up calculations focused on the UK and the US from consumption figures indicated emissions related to meat consumption are approximately 1.3-1.5 tCO(2e)yr(-1) per person. Comparing dietary changes with other ways of reducing GHG footprints indicates removing dietary meat is similar to avoiding one long-haul flight each year and a larger reduction than driving 100 miles less each week.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Species identification and animal authentication in meat products: a review
    Mahsa Alikord
    Hassan Momtaz
    Javad keramat
    Mahdi Kadivar
    Aziz Homayouni Rad
    Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2018, 12 : 145 - 155
  • [32] Biochip Technology for the Detection of Animal Species in Meat Products
    Iwobi, Azuka N.
    Huber, Ingrid
    Hauner, Georg
    Miller, Andreas
    Busch, Ulrich
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2011, 4 (03) : 389 - 398
  • [33] Species identification and animal authentication in meat products: a review
    Alikord, Mahsa
    Momtaz, Hassan
    Keramat, Javad
    Kadivar, Mahdi
    Rad, Aziz Homayouni
    JOURNAL OF FOOD MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION, 2018, 12 (01) : 145 - 155
  • [34] Biochip Technology for the Detection of Animal Species in Meat Products
    Azuka N. Iwobi
    Ingrid Huber
    Georg Hauner
    Andreas Miller
    Ulrich Busch
    Food Analytical Methods, 2011, 4 : 389 - 398
  • [35] USING ANIMAL BLOOD IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MEAT-PRODUCTS
    WISMERPEDERSEN, J
    NONNEMANN, K
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1980, 60 (02): : 231 - +
  • [36] Evaluation of Pleurotus ostreatus as dietary supplements in meat products
    Roming, Florentina Israel
    Luta, Gabriela
    Gherghina, Evelina
    Balan, Daniela
    Belc, Nastasia
    Mihociu, Tamara
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 24 : S94 - S94
  • [37] Pressurization technique: principles and impact on quality of meat and meat products
    Akhtar, Javeed
    Abrha, Mebrhit Gebremariam
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 264 - 285
  • [38] US consumers' mental associations with meat substitute products
    Garaus, Marion
    Garaus, Christian
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [39] Safety of Meat and Poultry Products at the US Department of Agriculture
    Goldman, D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2013, 54 : S20 - S20
  • [40] US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study
    Szejda, Keri
    Bryant, Christopher J.
    Urbanovich, Tessa
    FOODS, 2021, 10 (05)