Key attributes of the SAPHIRE risk and reliability analysis software for risk-informed probabilistic applications

被引:15
|
作者
Smith, Curtis [1 ]
Knudsen, James [1 ]
Kvarfordt, Kellie [1 ]
Wood, Ted [1 ]
机构
[1] EG&G Idaho Inc, Idaho Natl Engn Lab, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
关键词
risk-informed; PRA; PSA; probability; risk assessment; safety; reliability; software; SAPHIRE; analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2007.08.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Idaho National Laboratory is a primary developer of probabilistic risk and reliability analysis (PRRA) tools, dating back over 35 years. Evolving from mainframe-based software, the current state-of-the-practice has led to the creation of the SAPHIRE software. Currently, agencies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the National Aeronautics and Aerospace Agency, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense use version 7 of the SAPHIRE software for many of their risk-informed activities. In order to better understand and appreciate the power of software as part of risk-informed applications, we need to recall that our current analysis methods and solution methods have built upon pioneering work done 30-40 years ago. We contrast this work with the current capabilities in the SAPHIRE analysis package. As part of this discussion, we provide information for both the typical features and special analysis capabilities, which are available. We also present the application and results typically found with state-of-the-practice PRRA models. By providing both a high-level and detailed look at the SAPHIRE software, we give a snapshot in time for the current use of software tools in a risk-informed decision arena. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1164
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-Informed Safety Analysis for Accident Tolerant Fuels
    Parisi, Carlo
    Ma, Zhegang
    Mandelli, Diego
    Anderson, Nolan
    Zhang, Hongbin
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 194 (8-9) : 748 - 770
  • [22] Risk-Informed Analysis of Accidents at Reactor Facilities with VVER
    A. N. Kozlachkov
    V. N. Siryapin
    N. V. Siryapin
    A. A. Tribelev
    V. P. Shein
    [J]. Atomic Energy, 2018, 123 : 224 - 229
  • [23] Probabilistic and Risk-Informed Life Extension Assessment of Wind Turbine Structural Components
    Nielsen, Jannie Sonderkaer
    Miller-Branovacki, Lindsay
    Carriveau, Rupp
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [24] Risk-informed reliability-focused decision analysis support for effective facility change management
    Liming, JK
    Olson, BK
    [J]. ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2002 PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 6 - 13
  • [25] Realising the potential of risk-informed PrEP
    Schaefer, Robin
    Schmidt, Heather-Marie A.
    [J]. LANCET HIV, 2022, 9 (05): : E302 - E304
  • [26] INTEGRITY RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Langer, Doug
    Abdolrazaghi, Mona
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [27] Defaults and incentives in risk-informed regulation
    Bier, VM
    Jang, SC
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (04): : 635 - 644
  • [28] RISK-INFORMED SAFETY MARGIN CHARACTERIZATION
    Hess, Stephen M.
    Dinh, Nam
    Gaertner, John P.
    Szilard, Ronaldo
    [J]. ICONE 17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2009, : 11 - 17
  • [29] Risk-informed inservice inspection program
    Mayfield, ME
    Jackson, DA
    Guttman, J
    Cunningham, M
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 195 (02) : 211 - 215
  • [30] Quantitative Risk-Informed Design of Levees
    Sibley, Heather M.
    Vroman, Noah D.
    Shewbridge, Scott E.
    [J]. GEO-RISK 2017: IMPACT OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY, PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION, AND GEOHAZARDS, 2017, (284): : 76 - 90