In vitro testicular toxicity of environmentally relevant endocrine-disrupting chemicals: 2D vs. 3D models of prepubertal Leydig TM3 cells

被引:7
|
作者
Sychrova, Eliska [1 ]
Yawer, Affiefa [1 ]
Laboha, Petra [1 ]
Basu, Amrita [1 ]
Dydowiczova, Aneta [1 ]
Virmani, Ishita [1 ]
Babica, Pavel [1 ]
Sovadinova, Iva [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, RECETOX, Kotlarska 2, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, RECETOX, Kamenice 753-5,Pavil A29, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
关键词
3D in vitro models; Endocrine-disrupting chemicals; Leydig cells; Lipotoxicity; Reproductive toxicity; Spheroids; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; SERUM; COMMUNICATION; METABOLITES; EXPOSURES; SYSTEMS; PAHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.etap.2022.103869
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The testis is a priority organ for developing alternative models to assess male reproductive health hazards of chemicals. This study characterized a 3D in vitro model of murine prepubertal Leydig TM3 cells with improved expression of steroidogenesis markers suitable for image-based screening of testicular toxicity. This 3D scaffold free spheroid model was applied to explore the impact of prototypical endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and environmental reprotoxicants (benzo[a]pyrene, 2-and 9-methylanthracenes, fluoranthene, triclosan, triclocarban, methoxychlor) on male reproductive health. The results were compared to the male reprotoxicity potential of EDCs assessed in a traditional monolayer (2D) culture. The testicular toxicity was dependent not only on the type of culture (2D vs. 3D models) but also on the duration of exposure. Benzo[a]pyrene and triclocarban were the most active compounds, eliciting cytotoxic effects in prepubertal Leydig cells at low micromolar concentrations, which might be a mechanism contributing to their male reprotoxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Flow Modelling for Wind Farm Control: 2D vs. 3D
    van den Broek, Maarten J.
    Sanderse, Benjamin
    Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem
    SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND, TORQUE 2022, 2022, 2265
  • [12] In vitro 2D and 3D culture of frozen adult ovine testicular fragments
    Gomes, Francisco Denilson Rodrigues
    Ygnacio, Rensson Homero Celiz
    Naupas, Lucy Vanessa Sulca
    Tetaping, Gildas Mbemya
    Rodrigues, Ana Paula Robeiro
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2025, 272
  • [13] 2D vs. 3D titanium dioxide: Role of dispersion interactions
    Forrer, Daniel
    Vittadini, Andrea
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2011, 516 (1-3) : 72 - 75
  • [14] Skills comparison using a 2D vs. 3D laparoscopic simulator
    Romero-Loera, Sujey
    Eduardo Cardenas-Lailson, Luis
    de la Concha-Bermejillo, Florencio
    Aaron Crisanto-Campos, Braulio
    Valenzuela-Salazar, Carlos
    Moreno-Portillo, Mucio
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2016, 84 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [15] Evaluating Clinical Outcomes in 3D vs. 2D Vaginal Brachytherapy
    Kassick, M.
    Gao, S.
    Qian, J. M.
    Tien, C. J.
    Damast, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E493 - E494
  • [16] In vitro systems to study nephropharmacology: 2D versus 3D models
    Sanchez-Romero, Natalia
    Schophuizen, Carolien M. S.
    Gimenez, Ignacio
    Masereeuw, Rosalinde
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 790 : 36 - 45
  • [17] Advancements in 2D and 3D In Vitro Models for Studying Neuromuscular Diseases
    Kim, Haneul
    Kim, Gon Sup
    Hyun, Sang-Hwan
    Kim, Eunhye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (23)
  • [18] 2D and 3D in-Vitro models for mimicking cardiac physiology
    Abdelsayed, Gerges
    Ali, Danish
    Malone, Andrew
    Saidi, Jemil
    Myneni, Manoj
    Rajagopal, Keshava
    Cheema, Faisal H.
    Hameed, Aamir
    APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2022, 12
  • [19] Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games
    Koops, Martijn C.
    Verheul, Ineke
    Tiesma, Rinus
    de Boer, Cees-Willem
    Koeweiden, Ruben T.
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 2016, 47 (02) : 159 - 178
  • [20] Differences in 3D vs. 2D analysis in lumbar spinal fusion simulations
    Hsu, Hung-Wei
    Bashkuev, Maxim
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Schmidt, Hendrik
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 72 : 262 - 267