2D vs. 3D titanium dioxide: Role of dispersion interactions

被引:23
|
作者
Forrer, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Vittadini, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Sci Chim, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] CR INSTM Village, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[3] ISTM CNR, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
GENERALIZED GRADIENT APPROXIMATION; TIO2; POLYMORPHS; NANOSHEETS; STABILITY; PRINCIPLES; COMPLEXES; ANATASE; RUTILE; FILMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cplett.2011.09.053
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Dispersion-corrected DFT (DFT-D2 and DFT-D3) and van der Waals density functional (vdW-DF) calculations are performed on TiO2, taking in consideration structures common in the nanoscale, viz. two-dimensional lepidocrocite-like (LL) sheets as well as the rutile, brookite, anatase, and B polymorphs. Dispersion effects, which are of marginal importance when comparing 'monolithic' polymorphs, are stronger when the comparison is extended to LL structures. We find that, on one hand, LL sheets are less stable than previously estimated; on the other, stacking interactions in LL multilayers, though significant, are rather weak. Overall, these findings explain the reluctance of LL-TiO2 to form ordered stacks. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 75
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Signaling reactions in 2D vs. 3D
    Huang, William Y. C.
    Boxer, Steven G.
    Ferrell, James E.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 123 (03) : 21A - 21A
  • [2] 2D vs. 3D Mammography: Observer Study
    Fernandez, James Reza F.
    Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda
    Liu, Brent
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: ADVANCED PACS-BASED IMAGING INFORMATICS AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS, 2011, 7967
  • [3] Image quality vs. NEC in 2D and 3D PET
    Wilson, John W.
    Turkington, Timothy G.
    Wilson, Josh M.
    Colsher, James G.
    Ross, Steven G.
    2005 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 2133 - 2137
  • [4] 2D whispering gallery vs. 3D whispering cave
    Kwon, O'Dae
    LASER RESONATORS AND BEAM CONTROL X, 2008, 6872
  • [5] 2D vs. 3D positioning results for 4D treatments
    Lederer, Lydia
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 604 - 604
  • [6] 2D vs. 3D Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures
    Knight, Jessica
    Alves-Pereira, Fatima
    Keen, Christopher E.
    Jaremko, Jacob L.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (11):
  • [7] Flow Modelling for Wind Farm Control: 2D vs. 3D
    van den Broek, Maarten J.
    Sanderse, Benjamin
    Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem
    SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND, TORQUE 2022, 2022, 2265
  • [8] Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture
    Duval, Kayla
    Grover, Hannah
    Han, Li-Hsin
    Mou, Yongchao
    Pegoraro, Adrian F.
    Fredberg, Jeffery
    Chen, Zi
    PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 32 (04) : 266 - 277
  • [9] Skills comparison using a 2D vs. 3D laparoscopic simulator
    Romero-Loera, Sujey
    Eduardo Cardenas-Lailson, Luis
    de la Concha-Bermejillo, Florencio
    Aaron Crisanto-Campos, Braulio
    Valenzuela-Salazar, Carlos
    Moreno-Portillo, Mucio
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2016, 84 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [10] Evaluating Clinical Outcomes in 3D vs. 2D Vaginal Brachytherapy
    Kassick, M.
    Gao, S.
    Qian, J. M.
    Tien, C. J.
    Damast, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E493 - E494