2D vs. 3D titanium dioxide: Role of dispersion interactions

被引:23
|
作者
Forrer, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Vittadini, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Sci Chim, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] CR INSTM Village, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[3] ISTM CNR, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
GENERALIZED GRADIENT APPROXIMATION; TIO2; POLYMORPHS; NANOSHEETS; STABILITY; PRINCIPLES; COMPLEXES; ANATASE; RUTILE; FILMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cplett.2011.09.053
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Dispersion-corrected DFT (DFT-D2 and DFT-D3) and van der Waals density functional (vdW-DF) calculations are performed on TiO2, taking in consideration structures common in the nanoscale, viz. two-dimensional lepidocrocite-like (LL) sheets as well as the rutile, brookite, anatase, and B polymorphs. Dispersion effects, which are of marginal importance when comparing 'monolithic' polymorphs, are stronger when the comparison is extended to LL structures. We find that, on one hand, LL sheets are less stable than previously estimated; on the other, stacking interactions in LL multilayers, though significant, are rather weak. Overall, these findings explain the reluctance of LL-TiO2 to form ordered stacks. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 75
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D vs. 3D Numerical Approaches for Fish Habitat Evaluation of a Large River - Is 2D Modeling Sufficient?
    Fustos, Vivien
    Eros, Tibor
    Jozsa, Janos
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 65 (04): : 1114 - 1125
  • [22] 2D or Not 2D? Testing the Utility of 2D Vs. 3D Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics of the Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea)
    Buser, Thaddaeus J.
    Sidlauskas, Brian L.
    Summers, Adam P.
    ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2018, 301 (05): : 806 - 818
  • [23] 2D vs. 3D LiDAR-based Person Detection on Mobile Robots
    Jia, Dan
    Hermans, Alexander
    Leibe, Bastian
    IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2022, 2022-October : 3604 - 3611
  • [24] A comparison of 2D vs. 3D thresholding of X-ray CT imagery
    Elliot, Thomas R.
    Heck, Richard J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2007, 87 (04) : 405 - 412
  • [25] 2D vs. 3D LiDAR-based Person Detection on Mobile Robots
    Jia, Dan
    Hermans, Alexander
    Leibe, Bastian
    2022 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2022, : 3604 - 3611
  • [26] 3D virtual reality vs. 2D desktop registration user interface comparison
    Bueckle, Andreas
    Buehling, Kilian
    Shih, Patrick C.
    Boerner, Katy
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [27] Eye and Hand Fatigue in Minimal Invasive Surgery; 2D vs. 3D: RCT
    Youssef, A.
    Elbakbak, W.
    Bouhelal, A.
    Patel, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 81 - 81
  • [28] Moving through a changing world: Single cell migration in 2D vs. 3D
    Pawluchin, Anna
    Galic, Milos
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [29] 3D vs. 2D: On the Importance of Registration for Hallucinating Faces under Unconstrained Poses
    Qu, Chengchao
    Herrmann, Christian
    Monari, Eduardo
    Schuchert, Tobias
    Beyerer, Juergen
    2015 12TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND ROBOT VISION CRV 2015, 2015, : 139 - 146
  • [30] Mitotic spindle asymmetry in rodents and primates: 2D vs. 3D measurement methodologies
    Delaunay, Delphine
    Robini, Marc C.
    Dehay, Colette
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9 : 11