Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing

被引:0
|
作者
Ryan, RS
Schooler, JW
机构
[1] Union Coll, Dept Psychol, Barbourville, KY 40906 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The phenomenon of verbal overshadowing, in which describing memory for nonverbal stimuli (e.g. faces, tastes, or music) interferes with subsequent recognition performance, has previously been associated with situations in which participants' perceptual expertise exceeded their verbal expertise (e.g, Melcher and Schooler, 1996). Such findings suggest that individual differences in perceptual and verbal ability should predict who will be vulnerable to verbalization. In this study participants performed six trials of a standard verbal overshadowing procedure (viewing a face, verbally recalling it or engaging in an unrelated activity, followed by taking a forced choice recognition lest). Perceptual ability was assessed using both a domain specific measure (face recognition ability) and non-specific measures (e.g. embedded figures). General verbal ability was determined on the basis of high school or college GPA. As predicted, verbal overshadowing (i.e. lower performance for verbalization relative to control participants) was greatest among participants with high perceptual expertise and low verbal expertise. This relationship was observed with both the domain-specific and domain-general measures of perceptual expertise. These findings suggest that individuals may be especially vulnerable to verbal overshadowing when their general perceptual abilities exceed their verbal abilities. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:S105 / S125
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measures of individual differences in susceptibility to conditioning
    Lumsdaine, AA
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1941, 28 (05): : 428 - 435
  • [32] Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions
    Winograd, E
    Peluso, JP
    Glover, TA
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 12 : S5 - S27
  • [33] Individual differences in the susceptibility to forecasting biases
    De Baets, Shari
    Vanderheyden, Karlien
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 1106 - 1114
  • [34] Individual differences in susceptibility to proactive interference
    McIntyre, J
    Chow, G
    Jebamani, L
    Hau, R
    Smith, M
    Vause, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 28426 - 28426
  • [35] Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Inattentional Blindness
    Seegmiller, Janelle K.
    Watson, Jason M.
    Strayer, David L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (03) : 785 - 791
  • [36] THE DETECTION OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ACCIDENT SUSCEPTIBILITY
    FITZPATRICK, R
    BIOMETRICS, 1958, 14 (01) : 50 - 68
  • [37] Do multiple representations need explanations?: The role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning
    Moreno, R
    Durán, R
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (03) : 492 - 503
  • [38] When Do Words Hurt? A Multiprocess View of the Effects of Verbalization on Visual Memory
    Brown, Charity
    Brandimonte, Maria A.
    Wickham, Lee H. V.
    Bosco, Andrea
    Schooler, Jonathan W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (05) : 1244 - 1256
  • [39] What voices can do with words: pragmatics of verbal hallucinations
    Leudar, I
    Thomas, P
    McNally, D
    Glinski, A
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (04) : 885 - 898
  • [40] Individual differences in phonological learning and verbal STM span
    Elisabet Service
    Sini Maury
    Emilia Luotoniemi
    Memory & Cognition, 2007, 35 : 1122 - 1135