Long-term outcome in patients with a Gleason score ≤6 prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy

被引:21
|
作者
Birkhahn, Marc [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Penson, David F. [3 ,5 ]
Cai, Jie [4 ]
Groshen, Susan [4 ]
Stein, John P. [3 ]
Lieskovsky, Gary [3 ]
Skinner, Donald G. [3 ]
Cote, Richard J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Heilig Geist Krankenhaus, Dept Urol, Cologne, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; prognosis; Gleason score <= 6; metastasis; risk factors; PREOPERATIVE NOMOGRAM; DISEASE RECURRENCE; BIOPSY; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09978.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine the actual recurrence risk of patients with a Gleason score (GS) <= 6 treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and bilateral lymphadenectomy in a cohort with long-erm follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS The USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center database included 3235 consecutive patients who underwent RRP for prostate cancer between January 1972 and December 2005. We identified 1383 patients with a GS <= 6 in prostatectomy specimens. Median follow-up was 8.3 years. Data on pathological and clinical characteristics and outcome were prospectively recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the stratified log-rank test and stepwise Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A GS of 6 was present in 66%, 5 in 27%, 4 in 5% and 3 or 2 in 3% of cases. Tumour classification was pT2N0 (83%), pT3N0 (14%), pT4N0 (0.1%) and any TN1 (2%). Positive margins were seen in 18%. Estimated PSA and clinical recurrence rate were 14% and 4% after 10 years and 18% and 6% after 15 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, N-stage (P < 0.001), T-stage (P = 0.02) and margin status (P < 0.001) were associated with PSA recurrence. N-stage (P < 0.001) and T-stage (P = 0.01) were associated with clinical recurrence. Overall, patients with a GS = 6 accounted for 26% of all PSA recurrences and for 20% of all patients with clinical recurrences in the database. CONCLUSION A relatively small proportion of patients with a GS <= 6 cancer developed PSA recurrence and/or overt metastasis. However, these patients account for a substantial minority of those who experienced recurrence and metastasis.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 664
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Bagniewski, Stephanie
    Bergstralh, Erik J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Frank, Igor
    Blute, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03): : 864 - 870
  • [32] LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOME FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Robbiani, Jacopo
    Baumgartner, Martin
    Eberli, Daniel
    Wild, Peter
    Seifert, Hans-Helge
    Sulser, Tullio
    Hermanns, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E410 - E410
  • [33] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    D'Amico, Anthony, V
    Tilki, Derya
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (06) : E1116 - E1121
  • [34] Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Geybels, Milan S.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Bibikova, Marina
    Klotzle, Brandy
    Fan, Jian-Bing
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Feng, Ziding
    Ostrander, Elaine A.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Stanford, Janet L.
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2016, 8
  • [35] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, J. E.
    Chen, M. H.
    Huland, H.
    Graefen, M.
    Tilki, D.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E469 - E469
  • [36] Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Milan S. Geybels
    Jonathan L. Wright
    Marina Bibikova
    Brandy Klotzle
    Jian-Bing Fan
    Shanshan Zhao
    Ziding Feng
    Elaine A. Ostrander
    Daniel W. Lin
    Peter S. Nelson
    Janet L. Stanford
    Clinical Epigenetics, 2016, 8
  • [37] Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Pokala, Naveen
    Trulson, Jerry J.
    Islam, Majdee
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (06) : 1385 - 1392
  • [38] LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOME IN MEN WITH HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH ANTEGRADE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH INTENDED WIDE RESECTION
    Yamamoto, S.
    Yonese, J.
    Kawakami, S.
    Urakami, S.
    Kitsukawa, S.
    Numao, N.
    Fujii, Y.
    Masuda, H.
    Ishikawa, Y.
    Fukui, I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 267 - 268
  • [39] Oncological long-term outcome of 4772 patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy: Does the anaesthetic technique matter?
    Roiss, M.
    Schiffmann, J.
    Tennstedt, P.
    Kessler, T.
    Blanc, I.
    Goetz, A.
    Schlomm, T.
    Graefen, M.
    Reuter, D. A.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (12): : 1686 - 1692
  • [40] Radical retro pubic prostatectomy outcome in patients with pathological Gleason score ≥8
    Pushkar, D.
    Govorov, A.
    Kosko, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 102 - 102