Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Levels May Improve Diagnostic Assessment for Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients

被引:5
|
作者
Machowski, Michal [1 ]
Polanska, Anna [2 ]
Galecka-Nowak, Magdalena [1 ]
Mamzer, Aleksandra [2 ]
Skowronska, Marta [1 ]
Perzanowska-Brzeszkiewicz, Katarzyna [1 ]
Zajac, Barbara [2 ]
Ou-Pokrzewinska, Aisha [1 ]
Pruszczyk, Piotr [1 ]
Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Internal Med & Cardiol, Lindleya 4 St, PL-02005 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Lodz, Bieganski Hosp, Dept Cardiol 1, Kniaziewicza 1-5 St, PL-91347 Lodz, Poland
关键词
acute pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolic disease; COVID-19; COVID-19-associated coagulopathy; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11123298
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to a hypercoagulable state. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) seems to be higher in this subgroup of patients. Patients and methods: We combined data from two tertiary referral centers specialized in the management of PE. The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the prevalence of PE among a large population of consecutive patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia in two centers, (2) to identify a plasma D-dimer threshold that may be useful in PE diagnostic assessment, (3) to characterize the abnormalities associated with PE and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Results: The incidence of symptomatic acute PE was 19.3%. For diagnosing PE in COVID-19 patients, based on ROC curve analysis, we identified a D-dimer concentration/patient's age ratio of 70, which improved D-dimer diagnostic capacity for PE and led to a reclassification improvement of 14% (NRI 0.14, p = 0.03) when compared to a cut-off level of 1000 ng/mL. Especially in severe COVID-19 lung involvement, D-dimer/age ratio cut-off equal to 70 was characterized by high diagnostic feasibility (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value of 83%, 94%, 96%, and 73%, respectively). Apart from PE status, lung involvement and troponin T concentration were also independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In the subgroup of PE patients, mortality was comparable with non-PE patients (19/88 (21.5%) vs. 101/368 (27.4%) for non-PE, p = 0.26) and was associated with older age, higher Bova scores, and higher troponin T concentrations. Age was the sole independent predictor for mortality in this subgroup. Conclusions: PE in COVID-19 patients is common, but it may not influence mortality when managed at a specialized center. In suspected PE, age-adjusted D-dimer levels (upper limit of normal obtained from the formula patient's age x 70) may still be a useful tool to start the diagnostic workup. In COVID-19 patients without PE, older age, more extensive parenchymal involvement, or higher D-dimer levels are factors predicting mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence for Age-Adjusted D-Dimer to Rule out Pulmonary Embolism: An Institutional Study
    Balakrishnan, Ridin
    Casa, Daniel
    Gil, Morayma Reyes
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 154 : S5 - S5
  • [22] D-Dimer Assessment to Predict Pulmonary Embolism in ICU Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
    Louwsma, Jelger
    Langeveld, Bas
    Luyendijk, Jacqueline M.
    van den Oever, Huub L. A.
    COVID, 2023, 3 (09): : 1380 - 1388
  • [23] Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoffs for DVT and Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparison of Five Assays
    Farm, Maria
    Siddiqui, Anwar
    Onelov, Liselotte
    Chaireti, Roza
    Holmstrom, Margareta
    Antovic, Jovan P.
    BLOOD, 2016, 128 (22)
  • [24] Diagnostic value of age-adjusted D-Dimer cut-off values in suspected acute pulmonary embolism
    Kozlowska, M.
    Zdonczyk, O.
    Wyzgal, A.
    Kostrubiec, M.
    Koc, M.
    Pacho, S.
    Paczynska, M.
    Ciurzynski, M.
    Wisniewska, M.
    Pruszczyk, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 953 - 953
  • [25] Diagnostic performance of D-dimer in pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID19
    Zaibi, Haifa
    Chaabi, Khouloud
    Ouertani, Hend
    Othmani, Safia
    Ben Jemia, Emna
    Ben Amar, Jihen
    Hedhli, Hana
    Aouina, Hichem
    Chaabi, Khouloud
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [26] Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Wilts, I. T.
    Le Gal, G.
    Den Exter, P. L.
    Van Es, J.
    Carrier, M.
    Planquette, B.
    Buller, H. R.
    Righini, M.
    Huisman, M. V.
    Kamphuisen, P. W.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2017, 152 : 49 - 51
  • [27] Reply to the authors of "Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to exclude venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients''
    Godon, Alexandre
    Tacquard, Charles Ambroise
    Mansour, Alexandre
    Albaladejo, Pierre
    Gruel, Yves
    Susen, Sophie
    Godier, Anne
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (05)
  • [28] Comparison of the age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in the ED
    Sharif, Sameer
    Eventov, Michelle
    Kearon, Clive
    Parpia, Sameer
    Li, Meirui
    Jiang, River
    Sneath, Paula
    Fuentes, Carmen Otero
    Marriott, Christopher
    de Wit, Kerstin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (05): : 845 - 850
  • [29] Age adjusted d-dimer in diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism
    Gavin, N.
    Boyle, D.
    Murphy, G.
    Mokoka, M. C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (SUPPL 10) : 283 - 283
  • [30] D-dimer in patients infected with COVID-19 and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Garcia-Olive, Ignasi
    Sintes, Helena
    Radua, Joaquim
    Abad Capa, Jorge
    Rosell, Antoni
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 169