Gait profile score and gait variable scores in spina bifida

被引:2
|
作者
Fusagawa, Hiroyori [1 ,2 ]
Fujita, Hiroki [1 ]
Matsuyama, Toshikatsu [3 ]
Himuro, Nobuaki [4 ]
Teramoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Yamashita, Toshihiko [2 ]
Selber, Paulo [5 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Med Ctr Child Hlth & Rehabil, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Sapporo Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Sapporo Child Dev Gen Support Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Sapporo Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
spina bifida; gait analysis; gait profile score; gait variable scores; MULTILEVEL SURGERY; LUMBAR MYELOMENINGOCELE; CEREBRAL-PALSY; EQUINUS GAIT; CHILDREN; KINEMATICS; HIP; IMPACT; INDEX; LIMBS;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000000877
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quantitative data assessment on the basis of three-dimensional gait analysis has been routinely used in the evaluation of pathological gait of children with cerebral palsy. However, a similar quantitative methodology has not been applied for spina bifida patients in whom atypical gait patterns are thought to correlate with various levels of neurological paralysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences among gait patterns in spina bifida between different levels of neurological lesions using quantitative methods: Gait profile score (GPS) and gait variable scores (GVS), scoring subject's gait deviation from a reference. In this cross-sectional study, 22 children with spina bifida (11 women, 11 men; mean age 9.4 years, SD 3.8 years, range 3-17 years), were examined using three-dimensional gait analysis from 2008 to 2018. Physical examination allowed for classification of each of the 44 limbs as either L4, L5 or S1 and comparison with the GPS and GVS using a linear mixed model. GPS and the GVS of the pelvis and hip range of motion in the coronal plane were significantly higher in the L4 group than in the L5 and S1 groups (GPS, P = 0.041, P = 0.003, respectively; GVS of pelvis, P = 0.001, P = 0.001; GVS of hip, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) GVS (foot progression angle) was significantly lower in the S1 group than in L4 and L5 groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.037). We found that GPS and GVS enable us to quantitatively assess the differences among gait patterns between different neurological levels. The scoring tool showed the potential for detecting individual neurological changes.
引用
收藏
页码:E251 / E257
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cow gait scores and kinematic gait data: can people see gait irregularities?
    Van Nuffel, A.
    Sprenger, M.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    Maertens, W.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2009, 18 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [32] Correlations of the Gait Profile Score and the Movement Analysis Profile relative to clinical judgments
    Beynon, Sarah
    McGinley, Jennifer L.
    Dobson, Fiona
    Baker, Richard
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 32 (01) : 129 - 132
  • [33] Gait Profile Score in able-bodied and post-stroke individuals adjusted for the effect of gait speed
    Fukuchi, Claudiane A.
    Duarte, Marcos
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 69 : 40 - 45
  • [34] How many observations in the reference dataset are required to compute a consistent Gait Deviation Index & Gait Profile Score?
    Pouliot-Laforte, Annie
    Carvalho, Marys Franco
    Bonnefoy-Mazure, Alice
    Armand, Stephane
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2023, 99 : 51 - 53
  • [35] Gait profile score identifies changes in gait kinematics in nonfaller, faller and recurrent faller older adults women
    Santos Bueno, Guilherme Augusto
    Ribeiro, Darlan Martins
    Gervasio, Flavia Martins
    Correia, Anabela Martins
    de Menezes, Ruth Losada
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 72 : 76 - 81
  • [36] Fetal profile in fetuses with open spina bifida
    Prodan, Natalia
    Hoopmann, Markus
    Sonek, Jiri
    Oettling, Christoph
    Abele, Harald
    Wagner, Philipp
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 301 (05) : 1167 - 1171
  • [37] A study of the clinical profile and outcome of spina bifida
    Kumar, Theophilus Nikita
    Ramesh, M. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 5 (02): : 8 - 12
  • [38] Fetal profile in fetuses with open spina bifida
    Natalia Prodan
    Markus Hoopmann
    Jiri Sonek
    Christoph Oettling
    Harald Abele
    Philipp Wagner
    Karl Oliver Kagan
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 301 : 1167 - 1171
  • [39] The Multifeature Gait Score: An accurate way to assess gait quality
    Ben Mansour, Khaireddine
    Gorce, Philippe
    Rezzoug, Nasser
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [40] Quantitative Gait Analysis of Patients with Severe Symptomatic Spinal Stenosis Utilizing the Gait Profile Score: An Observational Clinical Study
    Lodin, Jan
    Jelinek, Marek
    Sames, Martin
    Vachata, Petr
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (04)