Gait profile score and gait variable scores in spina bifida

被引:2
|
作者
Fusagawa, Hiroyori [1 ,2 ]
Fujita, Hiroki [1 ]
Matsuyama, Toshikatsu [3 ]
Himuro, Nobuaki [4 ]
Teramoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Yamashita, Toshihiko [2 ]
Selber, Paulo [5 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Med Ctr Child Hlth & Rehabil, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Sapporo Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Sapporo Child Dev Gen Support Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Sapporo Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
spina bifida; gait analysis; gait profile score; gait variable scores; MULTILEVEL SURGERY; LUMBAR MYELOMENINGOCELE; CEREBRAL-PALSY; EQUINUS GAIT; CHILDREN; KINEMATICS; HIP; IMPACT; INDEX; LIMBS;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000000877
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quantitative data assessment on the basis of three-dimensional gait analysis has been routinely used in the evaluation of pathological gait of children with cerebral palsy. However, a similar quantitative methodology has not been applied for spina bifida patients in whom atypical gait patterns are thought to correlate with various levels of neurological paralysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences among gait patterns in spina bifida between different levels of neurological lesions using quantitative methods: Gait profile score (GPS) and gait variable scores (GVS), scoring subject's gait deviation from a reference. In this cross-sectional study, 22 children with spina bifida (11 women, 11 men; mean age 9.4 years, SD 3.8 years, range 3-17 years), were examined using three-dimensional gait analysis from 2008 to 2018. Physical examination allowed for classification of each of the 44 limbs as either L4, L5 or S1 and comparison with the GPS and GVS using a linear mixed model. GPS and the GVS of the pelvis and hip range of motion in the coronal plane were significantly higher in the L4 group than in the L5 and S1 groups (GPS, P = 0.041, P = 0.003, respectively; GVS of pelvis, P = 0.001, P = 0.001; GVS of hip, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) GVS (foot progression angle) was significantly lower in the S1 group than in L4 and L5 groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.037). We found that GPS and GVS enable us to quantitatively assess the differences among gait patterns between different neurological levels. The scoring tool showed the potential for detecting individual neurological changes.
引用
收藏
页码:E251 / E257
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Kinematic changes in gait in boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Utility of the Gait Deviation Index, the Gait Profile Score and the Gait Variable Scores
    Sienko, Susan
    Buckon, Cathleen
    Bagley, Anita
    Fowler, Eileen
    Heberer, Kent
    Staudt, Loretta
    Sison-Williamson, Mitell
    McDonald, Craig
    Sussman, Michael
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2023, 100 : 157 - 164
  • [2] Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Ankle Foot Orthosis on Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using the Gait Profile Score and Gait Variable Scores
    Manuela Galli
    Veronica Cimolin
    Chiara Rigoldi
    Giorgio Albertini
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2016, 28 : 367 - 379
  • [3] Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Ankle Foot Orthosis on Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using the Gait Profile Score and Gait Variable Scores
    Galli, Manuela
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Rigoldi, Chiara
    Albertini, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 28 (03) : 367 - 379
  • [4] The use of the gait profile score and gait variable score in individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
    de Souza, Mariana Angelica
    Cezarani, Ananda
    da Silva Lizzi, Elisangela Aparecida
    de Queiroz Davoli, Gabriela Barroso
    Mattiello, Stela Marcia
    Jones, Richard
    Mattiello-Sverzut, Ana Claudia
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 98
  • [5] Gait and dynamic balance in adults with spina bifida
    Bendt, Martina
    Forslund, Emelie Butler
    Hagman, Goran
    Hultling, Claes
    Seiger, Ake
    Franzen, Erika
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2022, 96 : 343 - 350
  • [6] Three-dimensional gait analysis in spina bifida
    Duffy, CM
    Hill, AE
    Cosgrove, AP
    Corry, IS
    Mollan, RAB
    Graham, HK
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1996, 16 (06) : 786 - 791
  • [7] Quantifying gait impairment in individuals affected by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: the usefulness of gait profile score and gait variable score
    Coghe, Giancarlo
    Pau, Massimiliano
    Mamusa, Elena
    Pisano, Cinzia
    Corona, Federica
    Pilloni, Giuseppina
    Porta, Micaela
    Marrosu, Giovanni
    Vannelli, Alessandro
    Frau, Jessica
    Lorefice, Lorena
    Fenu, Giuseppe
    Marrosu, Maria Giovanna
    Cocco, Eleonora
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (05) : 737 - 742
  • [8] Comparison of the Classifier Oriented Gait Score and the Gait Profile Score based on imitated gait impairments
    Christian, Josef
    Kroell, Josef
    Schwameder, Hermann
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2017, 55 : 49 - 54
  • [9] Treadmill Training and Overground Gait: Decision Making for a Toddler With Spina Bifida
    Moerchen, Victoria A.
    Habibi, Mohammad
    Lynett, Kelly A.
    Konrad, Jeffrey D.
    Hoefakker, Heather L.
    PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 23 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [10] Spina bifida at the sacral level: more than minor gait disturbances
    Schoenmakers, MAGC
    Gulmans, VAM
    Gooskens, RHJM
    Helders, PJM
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 18 (02) : 178 - 185