Multi-Sensor fusion and data analysis for operating conditions of low power transmission lines

被引:4
|
作者
Cao, Shipeng [1 ]
Fan, Qiao [1 ]
Yu, Wan Jin [2 ]
Wang, Li Tao [1 ]
Ni, Sha [1 ]
Chen, Jie [2 ]
机构
[1] Allcorehatress Beijing Technol Co Ltd Beijing, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Allcorehatress JiangSu Technol Co Ltd, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Low power transmission line; Big data; Fusion algorithm; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110586
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The research of the safety distance among drones and cable attracted wide attention with the rising deployment of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to check for high-voltage overhead power systems. To increase the inspection operation's dependability and guarantee a safe and stable functioning of the transmission grid and inspections equipment, it is essential to determine the safety distance among the UAV and the driveway. Due to UAV patrol safety distances from overhead power lines, it is difficult to offer precise surfing information because of the lack of quantitative assistance. The author of the relevant study uses multi-sensor fusion data analysis (MFDA-LPTL). There have been discussions on the properties of large data sets, smart networks, and gigantic data sets before the emergence of low-cost power transmission lines and the benefits they may give. For example, using the adaptive weighted fusional method, which combines first-level data on homogenous sensor input based on critical UAVinfluencing factors such as maximum inspection speed, wind speed, positioning error, and drone size, can help achieve this goal. As a secondary benefit, the theory makes use of more robust evidence than before. However, the use of big data analytics in present smart grids must be expanded due to numerous challenges, such as the need for new technologies and increased public awareness. The experimental analysis shows that the proposed MFDA-LPTL model increases the performance ratio of 98.9%, efficiency ratio of 97.2%, reduces the detection failure analysis of 10.2%, processing time of 7.8%, positioning error rate of 12.3% compared to other existing methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research on multi-sensor data fusion technique
    Wang Hongliang
    Ma Zhigang
    ISTM/2007: 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-7, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 3480 - 3483
  • [22] Data Fusion in Distributed Multi-sensor System
    GUO Hang YU Min
    Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2004, (03) : 214 - 217
  • [23] Data Fusion and Trajectory Prediction of Multi-Sensor
    Ma Liang-liang
    Tian Fu-peng
    12TH ANNUAL MEETING OF CHINA ASSOCIATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AND SMART GRID, 2010, : 213 - 218
  • [24] Tracking filter and multi-sensor data fusion
    Girija, G
    Raol, JR
    Raj, RA
    Kashyap, S
    SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2000, 25 (2): : 159 - 167
  • [25] Tracking filter and multi-sensor data fusion
    Girija, G.
    Raol, J.R.
    Raj, R.Appavu
    Kashyap, Sudesh
    Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 2000, 25 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [26] Clustering Methods for Multi-sensor data fusion
    Han, Liu
    Lei, Zhang
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL CONTROL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ICICEE), 2012, : 1166 - 1169
  • [27] Multi-sensor data fusion in defence and aerospace
    Harris, CJ
    Bailey, A
    Dodd, TJ
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 102 (1015): : 229 - 244
  • [28] System Identification for Multi-Sensor Data Fusion
    Hernandez, Karla
    Spall, James C.
    2015 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2015, : 3931 - 3936
  • [29] Effective fusion of distorted multi-sensor data
    Suranthiran, S
    Jayasuriya, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL, 2003, : 444 - 449
  • [30] Tracking filter and multi-sensor data fusion
    G. Girija
    J. R. Raol
    R. Appavu raj
    Sudesh Kashyap
    Sadhana, 2000, 25 : 159 - 167