Early Outcomes of Revision Surgery for Taper Corrosion of Dual Taper Total Hip Arthroplasty in 187 Patients

被引:31
|
作者
Dimitriou, Dimitris [1 ]
Liow, Ming Han Lincoln [1 ]
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan [1 ]
Leone, William A. [2 ]
Li, Guoan [1 ]
Kwon, Young-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Holy Cross Hosp, Orthoped Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2016年 / 31卷 / 07期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; taper corrosion; clinical outcomes; modular femoral neck stem; dual taper; systematic evaluation; LOCAL TISSUE REACTION; MODULAR-NECK; FEMORAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; METAL; PSEUDOTUMOR; RESURFACINGS; REPLACEMENT; STEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.015
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modular dual taper femoral neck designs have been associated with taper corrosion requiring revision surgery. However, outcomes after revision dual taper total hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic adverse local tissue reaction due to taper corrosion remain largely unknown. Methods: A total of 198 revision surgeries in 187 patients with dual taper femoral stem total hip arthroplasty with minimum 12-month follow-up were evaluated. Results: At mean follow-up of 18 months, at least 1 complication had occurred in 39 patients (20%) of 198 revisions. Single episode of dislocation, treated with close reduction, occurred in 16, whereas 2 patients required rerevision due to multiple dislocations. Infection requiring rerevision occurred in 3 patients. Adverse local tissue reaction recurrence requiring reoperation occurred in 6 patients. Implant survivorship for revision for any cause was 86% at 30 months. The reoperation rate of revised dual taper was 8% (16 out of 198 hips). The median serum levels of cobalt, chromium, and cobalt/chromium ratio decreased (P < .01) from 5.3 mu g/L (range: 2.3-48.5 mu g/L), 2.6 mu g/L (range: 0.2-64 mu g/L), and 4.7 (range: 2.1-35) prerevision to 1.4 mu g/L (range: 0.2-8.8 mu g/L), 0.7 mu g/L (range: 0.1-3.9 mu g/L), and 2.2 (range: 0.4-8.8) postrevision, respectively. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that intraoperative tissue necrosis was associated with a high rate of early complications (20%) and revisions (8%), suggesting the importance of a systematic evaluation of these patients including metal ion levels and metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging in optimizing revision outcome, as early diagnosis will facilitate the initiation of appropriate treatment before significant adverse tissue necrosis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1554
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taper corrosion: a complication of total hip arthroplasty
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Hube, Robert
    Wassilew, Georgi
    Prange, Felix
    Huber, Gerd
    Perka, Carsten
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2020, 5 (11) : 776 - 784
  • [2] Metrology for Dual Taper Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Van Citters, Douglas W.
    Assael, Dylan J.
    Currier, John H.
    MODULARITY AND TAPERS IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT DEVICES, 2015, 1591 : 164 - 180
  • [3] Sensitivity and Specificity of Metal Ion Levels in Predicting "Pseudotumors" due to Taper Corrosion in Patients With Dual Taper Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
    Leone, William A.
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (03): : 996 - 1000
  • [4] Risk Factors Associated With Early Complications of Revision Surgery for Head-Neck Taper Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Rossi, Daniel
    MacAuliffe, John
    Peng, Yun
    Arauz, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (10): : 3231 - 3237
  • [5] Revision for taper corrosion at the neck-body junction following total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls
    Weiser M.C.
    Chen D.D.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2016, 9 (1) : 75 - 83
  • [6] Do Stem Taper Microgrooves Influence Taper Corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Retrieval Study
    Arnholt, Christina M.
    MacDonald, Daniel W.
    Underwood, Richard J.
    Guyer, Eric P.
    Rimnac, Clare M.
    Kurtz, Steven M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Klein, Gregg R.
    Lee, Gwo-Chin
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Hamlin, Brian R.
    Cates, Harold E.
    Malkani, Arthur L.
    Kraay, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04): : 1363 - 1373
  • [7] Comparison of single taper and dual taper versions of the same stem design in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
    Francesco Castagnini
    Barbara Bordini
    Monica Cosentino
    Enrico Tassinari
    Giulia Guizzardi
    Francesco Traina
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 24
  • [8] Comparison of single taper and dual taper versions of the same stem design in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
    Castagnini, Francesco
    Bordini, Barbara
    Cosentino, Monica
    Tassinari, Enrico
    Guizzardi, Giulia
    Traina, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [9] What Do We Know About Taper Corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Jacobs, J. J.
    Cooper, H. J.
    Urban, R. M.
    Wixson, R. L.
    Della Valle, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (04): : 668 - 669
  • [10] Evaluation of the Painful Dual Taper Modular Neck Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: Do They All Require Revision?
    Kwon, Young-Min
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (07): : 1385 - 1389