Computational modeling of individual differences in short term memory search

被引:4
|
作者
Chuderski, Adam
Stettner, Zbigniew
Orzechowski, Jaroslaw
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Krakow, Poland
[2] Warsaw Sch Social Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
focus of attention; short term memory; computational modeling; individual differences;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modeling of individual or group diff. erences, believed to be a powerful test for computational models, is still rare in current cognitive science. In this paper, we discuss alternative approaches to the computational modeling of both qualitative and quantitative differences among individuals as well as groups of individuals. Then, an example is presented of how accounting for individual differences in short term memory (STM) search can bring us insight into cognitive processes underlying this phenomenon, insight that otherways would be impossible. The two-phase computational model of memory search implements the idea of working memory (WM) focus of attention (FA): due to updating process a few items may be actively kept and easily accessed in ACT-R goal buffer. FA is being scanned serially first, and if the scan result is negative, a parallel chunk retrieval from active part of declarative memory outside the FA may run with certain probability. The model aptly simulates steep decrease in accuracy as well as steep increase in latency for responses to five most recent stimuli. The model also predicts the observed e. ffect of faster negative responses than positive responses to less recent stimuli. Most important, with manipulation to only one of its parameters (i. e., the capacity of FA) our model is able to predict 94% of variance for two groups of participants that differed in latency patterns (i. e., 'serial-like' vs. 'parallel-like' groups) of the search process. (C) 2007 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CONNECTIONIST MODELING OF SHORT-TERM-MEMORY
    NORRIS, D
    PAGE, M
    BADDELEY, A
    LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1995, 10 (3-4): : 407 - 409
  • [42] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND MODELS OF MEMORY SPAN - A ROLE FOR MEMORY-SEARCH RATE
    PUCKETT, JM
    KAUSLER, DH
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1984, 10 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [43] Modality differences in short-term memory for rhythms
    Collier, GL
    Logan, G
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (04) : 529 - 538
  • [44] Modality differences in short-term memory for rhythms
    Geoffrey L. Collier
    Gordon Logan
    Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 : 529 - 538
  • [45] Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search while reading
    Ralph S. Redden
    Kaylee Eady
    Raymond M. Klein
    Jean Saint-Aubin
    Memory & Cognition, 2023, 51 : 321 - 335
  • [46] Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search while reading
    Redden, Ralph S.
    Eady, Kaylee
    Klein, Raymond M.
    Saint-Aubin, Jean
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2023, 51 (02) : 321 - 335
  • [47] TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN EPISODIC MEMORY: MODELING THE DYNAMICS OF RECOGNITION MEMORY
    Malmberg, Kenneth J.
    SKILL AND STRATEGY IN MEMORY USE, 2007, 48 : 313 - 349
  • [48] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN LONG-TERM-MEMORY ACCESS
    HUNT, EB
    DAVIDSON, J
    LANSMAN, M
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 1981, 9 (06) : 599 - 608
  • [49] Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory
    Robison, Matthew K.
    Trost, Jamie M.
    Schor, Daniel
    Gibson, Bradley S.
    Healey, M. Karl
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2022, 29 (04) : 1355 - 1366
  • [50] Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory
    Matthew K. Robison
    Jamie M. Trost
    Daniel Schor
    Bradley S. Gibson
    M. Karl Healey
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2022, 29 : 1355 - 1366