Computational modeling of individual differences in short term memory search

被引:4
|
作者
Chuderski, Adam
Stettner, Zbigniew
Orzechowski, Jaroslaw
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Krakow, Poland
[2] Warsaw Sch Social Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
focus of attention; short term memory; computational modeling; individual differences;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modeling of individual or group diff. erences, believed to be a powerful test for computational models, is still rare in current cognitive science. In this paper, we discuss alternative approaches to the computational modeling of both qualitative and quantitative differences among individuals as well as groups of individuals. Then, an example is presented of how accounting for individual differences in short term memory (STM) search can bring us insight into cognitive processes underlying this phenomenon, insight that otherways would be impossible. The two-phase computational model of memory search implements the idea of working memory (WM) focus of attention (FA): due to updating process a few items may be actively kept and easily accessed in ACT-R goal buffer. FA is being scanned serially first, and if the scan result is negative, a parallel chunk retrieval from active part of declarative memory outside the FA may run with certain probability. The model aptly simulates steep decrease in accuracy as well as steep increase in latency for responses to five most recent stimuli. The model also predicts the observed e. ffect of faster negative responses than positive responses to less recent stimuli. Most important, with manipulation to only one of its parameters (i. e., the capacity of FA) our model is able to predict 94% of variance for two groups of participants that differed in latency patterns (i. e., 'serial-like' vs. 'parallel-like' groups) of the search process. (C) 2007 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Search Action Sequence Modeling with Long Short-Term Memory for Search Task Success Evaluation
    Fan, Alin
    Chen, Ling
    Chen, Gencai
    THIRTY-SECOND AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTIETH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE / EIGHTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 2200 - 2207
  • [22] Working memory relates to individual differences in speech category learning: Insights from computational modeling and pupillometry
    McHaney, Jacie R.
    Tessmer, Rachel
    Roark, Casey L.
    Chandrasekaran, Bharath
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2021, 222
  • [23] Developmental differences in short term memory and working memory span
    Larcan, R
    Cuzzocrea, F
    Filipello, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 450 - 450
  • [24] Aging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance
    Hertzog, C
    Cooper, BP
    Fisk, AD
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1996, 11 (03) : 497 - 520
  • [25] Arousal, processing resources and individual differences in visual and memory search
    Matthews, G.
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Visual Search, 1988,
  • [26] Working Memory Capacity and Categorization: Individual Differences and Modeling
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (03) : 720 - 738
  • [27] Modeling individual differences in a digit working memory task
    Lovett, MC
    Reder, LM
    Lebiere, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1997, : 460 - 465
  • [28] REHEARSAL OF INDIVIDUAL ITEMS IN SHORT-TERM MEMORY
    MEUNIER, GF
    MEUNIER, JA
    RITZ, D
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 95 (02): : 465 - &
  • [29] From short term memory to semantics - A computational model
    Prasad, PC
    Arunkumar, S
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 63 - 73
  • [30] Computational Modeling of Individual Differences in Behavioral Estimates of Cochlear Nonlinearities
    Skyler G. Jennings
    Jayne B. Ahlstrom
    Judy R. Dubno
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2014, 15 : 945 - 960