Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk

被引:44
|
作者
Galan-Martin, Angel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vazquez, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Cobo, Selene [1 ]
Mac Dowell, Niall [5 ,6 ]
Antonio Caballero, Jose [4 ]
Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Chem & Appl Biosci, Inst Chem & Bioengn, Vladimir Prelog Weg 1, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Chem Environm & Mat Engn, Campus Las Lagunillas S-N, Jaen 23071, Spain
[3] Univ Jaen, Ctr Adv Studies Earth Sci Energy & Environm CEACT, Campus Las Lagunillas S-N, Jaen 23071, Spain
[4] Univ Alicante, Nstit Ute Chem Proc Engn, PO 99, E-3080 Alicante, Spain
[5] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, Exhibit Rd, London SW7 1NA, England
[6] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Exhibit Rd, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; CAPTURE; STORAGE; ENERGY; NEED;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-26680-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will be essential to meet the climate targets, so enabling its deployment at the right time will be decisive. Here, we investigate the still poorly understood implications of delaying CDR actions, focusing on integrating direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (DACCS and BECCS) into the European Union power mix. Under an indicative target of -50 Gt of net CO2 by 2100, delayed CDR would cost an extra of 0.12-0.19 trillion EUR per year of inaction. Moreover, postponing CDR beyond mid-century would substantially reduce the removal potential to almost half (-35.60 Gt CO2) due to the underused biomass and land resources and the maximum technology diffusion speed. The effective design of BECCS and DACCS systems calls for long-term planning starting from now and aligned with the evolving power systems. Our quantitative analysis of the consequences of inaction on CDR-with climate targets at risk and fair CDR contributions at stake-should help to break the current impasse and incentivize early actions worldwide. The implications of delaying carbon dioxide removal (CDR) are poorly understood. Here the authors highlight the potential extra costs and reduced removal potential of delayed CDR action, with a special focus on direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (DACCS and BECCS).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union
    Fragkos, Panagiotis
    Fragkiadakis, Kostas
    Sovacool, Benjamin
    Paroussos, Leonidas
    Vrontisi, Zoi
    Charalampidis, Ioannis
    ENERGY, 2021, 237
  • [42] A Comparative Study of Firm-Level Climate Change Mitigation Targets in the European Union and the United States
    Wang, Derek
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [43] The impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon dioxide emissions: a matrix completion analysis
    Biancalani, Francesco
    Gnecco, Giorgio
    Metulini, Rodolfo
    Riccaboni, Massimo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] TOWARDS INTEGRATION BETWEEN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Tremiterra, Maria Rosa
    TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 11 (03) : 369 - 372
  • [45] Microalgal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Utilization from the European Union Perspective
    Zielinski, Marcin
    Debowski, Marcin
    Kazimierowicz, Joanna
    Swica, Izabela
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [46] Addition by Subtraction Why carbon dioxide removal is key to achieving aggressive climate goals
    Warren, Chris
    EPRI Journal, 2022, 2022 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [47] Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal
    Heck, Vera
    Donges, Jonathan F.
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2016, 7 (04) : 783 - 796
  • [48] Implications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE model
    Rickels, Wilfried
    Schwinger, Joerg
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (10)
  • [49] Carbon dioxide removal and mitigation deterrence in EU climate policy: Towards a research approach
    Brad, Alina
    Schneider, Etienne
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 150
  • [50] Reassessing the need for carbon dioxide removal: moral implications of alternative climate target pathways
    Voget-Kleschin, Lieske
    Baatz, Christian
    Heyward, Clare
    Van Vuuren, Detlef
    Mengis, Nadine
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 7