Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk

被引:44
|
作者
Galan-Martin, Angel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vazquez, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Cobo, Selene [1 ]
Mac Dowell, Niall [5 ,6 ]
Antonio Caballero, Jose [4 ]
Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Chem & Appl Biosci, Inst Chem & Bioengn, Vladimir Prelog Weg 1, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Chem Environm & Mat Engn, Campus Las Lagunillas S-N, Jaen 23071, Spain
[3] Univ Jaen, Ctr Adv Studies Earth Sci Energy & Environm CEACT, Campus Las Lagunillas S-N, Jaen 23071, Spain
[4] Univ Alicante, Nstit Ute Chem Proc Engn, PO 99, E-3080 Alicante, Spain
[5] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, Exhibit Rd, London SW7 1NA, England
[6] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Exhibit Rd, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; CAPTURE; STORAGE; ENERGY; NEED;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-26680-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will be essential to meet the climate targets, so enabling its deployment at the right time will be decisive. Here, we investigate the still poorly understood implications of delaying CDR actions, focusing on integrating direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (DACCS and BECCS) into the European Union power mix. Under an indicative target of -50 Gt of net CO2 by 2100, delayed CDR would cost an extra of 0.12-0.19 trillion EUR per year of inaction. Moreover, postponing CDR beyond mid-century would substantially reduce the removal potential to almost half (-35.60 Gt CO2) due to the underused biomass and land resources and the maximum technology diffusion speed. The effective design of BECCS and DACCS systems calls for long-term planning starting from now and aligned with the evolving power systems. Our quantitative analysis of the consequences of inaction on CDR-with climate targets at risk and fair CDR contributions at stake-should help to break the current impasse and incentivize early actions worldwide. The implications of delaying carbon dioxide removal (CDR) are poorly understood. Here the authors highlight the potential extra costs and reduced removal potential of delayed CDR action, with a special focus on direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (DACCS and BECCS).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk
    Ángel Galán-Martín
    Daniel Vázquez
    Selene Cobo
    Niall Mac Dowell
    José Antonio Caballero
    Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [2] Targeting carbon dioxide removal in the European Union
    Geden, Oliver
    Peters, Glen P.
    Scott, Vivian
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2019, 19 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [3] Novel carbon dioxide removals techniques must be integrated into the European Union's climate policies
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Schenuit, Felix
    Lundberg, Liv
    Mollersten, Kenneth
    Bottcher, Miranda
    Rickels, Wilfried
    Hansson, Anders
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [4] Novel carbon dioxide removals techniques must be integrated into the European Union’s climate policies
    Mathias Fridahl
    Felix Schenuit
    Liv Lundberg
    Kenneth Möllersten
    Miranda Böttcher
    Wilfried Rickels
    Anders Hansson
    Communications Earth & Environment, 4
  • [5] Is carbon dioxide removal 'mitigation of climate change'?
    Honegger, Matthias
    Burns, Wil
    Morrow, David R.
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2021, 30 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [6] Explanatory Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the European Union
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    Leitao, Nuno Carlos
    STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 124 (03): : 88 - 95
  • [7] New European Union regulation of clinical trials puts trial participants at risk
    Hasford, Joerg
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [8] The intangible technological innovation system: The role and influence of voluntary and compliance carbon markets on carbon dioxide removal in the European Union
    Deknatel, Nick
    van der Loos, Adriaan
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2025, 119
  • [9] Integrating Carbon Dioxide Removal Into European Emissions Trading
    Rickels, Wilfried
    Proelss, Alexander
    Geden, Oliver
    Burhenne, Julian
    Fridahl, Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2021, 3
  • [10] Assessing the influence of climate risk, carbon allowances, and technological factors on the ESG market in the European union
    Pata, Ugur Korkut
    Mohammed, Kamel Si
    Serret, Vanessa
    Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik
    BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2024, 24 (04) : 828 - 837