Athrombogenic coating of long-term venous catheter for cancer patients: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

被引:12
|
作者
Hitz, Felicitas [1 ]
Klingbiel, Dirk [3 ]
Omlin, Aurelius [1 ]
Riniker, Salome [1 ]
Zerz, Andreas [2 ]
Cerny, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital, Dept Hematol Oncol, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Kantonsspital Bruderholz, Chirurg Klin, CH-4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Grp Clin Canc Res SAKK, Coordinating Ctr, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Central venous catheter; Athrombogenic layer; Coated; Cancer; Venous thrombosis; Infection; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; ACCESS DEVICES; BREAST-CANCER; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; THROMBOEMBOLISM; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; ONCOLOGY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00277-011-1343-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cancer patients with long-term venous catheter are at risk for thromboembolic complications at the catheter tip and in the adjacent venous vessels. We assessed whether local thrombogenicity could be prevented with an experimental coated (with athrombogenic layer) catheter device (CD) compared to an uncoated CD. Patients requiring a long-term venous catheter were randomly allocated to receive either a standard uncoated or experimental coated (with athrombogenic CamouflageA (R) layer) CD. The athrombogenic layer creates a barrier against non-specific adsorption of plasma proteins. The primary endpoint was urokinase injection in cases of an unsuccessful blood aspiration from the CD. Secondary endpoints included early (haematoma, pneumothorax) and late (venous thrombosis, infection) catheter-associated complications and catheter defects. One hundred and seventy-nine patients were randomly assigned to a CD (experimental n = 89/standard n = 90). One hundred and ten (62%) patients with a total of 1,286 catheter taps were analysed for the primary endpoint. Necessity for urokinase injection was 8/680 (1.2% experimental) vs. 33/606 (5.4% standard) per catheter tap and 4/55 (7.3% experimental) vs. 18/55 (32.7% standard) per patient. A repeated measures logistic regression to assess the effect of coating yielded an odds ratio of 3.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-10.4; p = 0.03) for the primary endpoint. All patients allocated per protocol were analysed for the secondary endpoints. Nine (5.4%) local thrombotic complications, seven (4.1%) catheter infections, and no catheter defect were observed. Athrombogenic coating of CD in cancer patients resulted in a significant reduced necessity for urokinase injections and subsequently less inconvenience for patients and fewer costly interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LONG-TERM DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF ORAL PRAZOSIN IN CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE
    COLUCCI, WS
    WYNNE, J
    HOLMAN, BL
    BRAUNWALD, E
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (02): : A159 - A159
  • [32] LONG-TERM THERAPY OF HEART-FAILURE WITH PRAZOSIN - RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    COLUCCI, WS
    WYNNE, J
    HOLMAN, BL
    BRAUNWALD, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1980, 45 (02): : 337 - 344
  • [33] Double-blind randomized trial of colchicine in biliary atresia: Long-term clinical outcome
    不详
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2005, 40 (05): : 627 - 628
  • [34] LONG-TERM DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL OF IBUPROFEN AND INDOMETHACIN IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    ROYER, GL
    MOXLEY, TE
    HEARRON, MS
    MIYARA, A
    SHENKER, BM
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 3 (03) : 158 - 171
  • [35] VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF PRINZMETAL VARIANT ANGINA - A LONG-TERM, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    JOHNSON, SM
    MAURITSON, DR
    HILLIS, LD
    WILLERSON, JT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1981, 47 (02): : 399 - 399
  • [36] Double-blind randomized trial of colchicine in biliary atresia: Long-term clinical outcome
    Hadzic, N
    Davenport, M
    Tizzard, S
    Cheeseman, P
    Mowat, AP
    Mieli-Vergani, G
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 : 235 - 236
  • [37] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LONG-TERM DIURETIC THERAPY FOR BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA
    ALBERSHEIM, SG
    SOLIMANO, AJ
    SHARMA, AK
    SMYTH, JA
    ROTSCHILD, A
    WOOD, BJ
    SHEPS, SB
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1989, 115 (04): : 615 - 620
  • [38] Nebivolol versus enalapril in essential hypertension: A long-term double-blind comparative trial
    Van Nueten, L
    Nielsen, MR
    Vertommen, C
    Dupont, AG
    Robertson, JIS
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 1999, 54 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [39] Randomised double-blind comparison of the incidence of tardive dyskinesia in patients with schizophrenia during long-term treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol
    Beasley, CM
    Dellva, MA
    Tamura, RN
    Morgenstern, H
    Glazer, WM
    Ferguson, K
    Tollefson, GD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 174 : 23 - 30
  • [40] Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial
    Yadav, Tarun
    Golhar, Mayuri
    Saini, Chhavi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2025, 19 (01) : UC1 - UC5