A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections

被引:206
|
作者
Noel, Gary J. [1 ]
Bush, Karen [1 ]
Bagchi, Partha [1 ]
Ianus, Juliana [1 ]
Strauss, Richard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/526527
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections due to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria was conducted to compare ceftobiprole monotherapy with treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Methods. Patients were randomized 2: 1 to receive ceftobiprole or to receive vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Outcomes were determined at a test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after completion of therapy) and were analyzed for all patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, as well as for subgroups, on the basis of major types of infections and severity of disease. Results. Among the clinically evaluable and the intent-to-treat populations, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were similar in the ceftobiprole and comparator treatment arms (clinical cure rate, 90.5% [439 of 485 patients] and 90.2% [220 of 244 patients] in the clinically evaluable population, respectively; 81.9% [448 of 547 patients] and 80.8% [227 of 281 patients] in the intent-to-treat population, respectively). Clinical cure rates in ceftobiprole-treated patients ranged from 86.2% (125 of 145 patients) among those with diabetes who had foot infections to 93.0% (80 of 86 patients) among those with cellulitis. Among patients treated with ceftobiprole, clinical cure rates were similar among patients from whom gram-negative bacteria were isolated (87.9% [109 of 124 patients]) and among patients from whom gram-positive bacteria were isolated (91.8% [292 of 318 patients]) and were not statistically different from the clinical cure rates among comparator-treated patients (89.7% [61 of 68 patients] and 90.3% [149 of 165 patients], respectively). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were similar. Conclusions. Ceftobiprole monotherapy is as effective as vancomycin plus ceftazidime for treating patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exposure-response analyses of tigecycline efficacy in patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Meagher, A. K.
    Passarell, J. A.
    Cirincione, B. B.
    Van Wart, S. A.
    Liolios, K.
    Babinchak, T.
    Ellis-Grosse, E. J.
    Ambrose, P. G.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 51 (06) : 1939 - 1945
  • [42] A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study
    O'Riordan, William
    McManus, Alison
    Teras, Juri
    Poromanski, Ivan
    Cruz-Saldariagga, Maria
    Quintas, Megan
    Lawrence, Laura
    Liang, ShuJui
    Cammarata, Sue
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (05) : 657 - 666
  • [43] Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
    Jauregui, LE
    Babazadeh, S
    Seltzer, E
    Goldberg, L
    Krievins, D
    Frederick, M
    Krause, D
    Satilovs, I
    Endzinas, Z
    Breaux, J
    O'Riordan, W
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 41 (10) : 1407 - 1415
  • [44] A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections
    Barie, PS
    Vogel, SB
    Dellinger, EP
    Rotstein, OD
    Solomkin, JS
    Yang, JY
    Baumgartner, TF
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1997, 132 (12) : 1294 - 1302
  • [45] TD-1792 versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
    Stryjewski, Martin E.
    Potgieter, Peter D.
    Li, Yu-Ping
    Barriere, Steven L.
    Churukian, Allan
    Kingsley, Jeff
    Corey, G. Ralph
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (11) : 5476 - 5483
  • [46] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF CEFTAZIDIME AND MOXALACTAM IN COMPLICATED URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS
    HOROWITZ, EA
    PREHEIM, LC
    SAFRANEK, TJ
    PUGSLEY, MP
    SANDERS, CC
    BITTNER, MJ
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1985, 28 (02) : 299 - 301
  • [47] Daptomycin is clinically more rapidly effective than comparator for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Friedrich, L.
    Krige, J.
    Lindfield, K.
    Otradovec, C.
    Martone, W.
    Katz, D.
    Tally, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S214 - S214
  • [49] A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections treated with delafloxacin, linezolid or vancomycin
    Kingsley, Jeff
    Mehra, Purvi
    Lawrence, Laura E.
    Henry, Eugenia
    Duffy, Erin
    Cammarata, Sue K.
    Pullman, John
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (03) : 821 - 829
  • [50] Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: Results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam
    Breedt, J
    Teras, J
    Gardovskis, J
    Maritz, FJ
    Vaasna, T
    Ross, DP
    Gioud-Paquet, M
    Dartois, N
    Ellis-Grosse, EJ
    Loh, E
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (11) : 4658 - 4666