A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections

被引:206
|
作者
Noel, Gary J. [1 ]
Bush, Karen [1 ]
Bagchi, Partha [1 ]
Ianus, Juliana [1 ]
Strauss, Richard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/526527
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections due to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria was conducted to compare ceftobiprole monotherapy with treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Methods. Patients were randomized 2: 1 to receive ceftobiprole or to receive vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Outcomes were determined at a test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after completion of therapy) and were analyzed for all patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, as well as for subgroups, on the basis of major types of infections and severity of disease. Results. Among the clinically evaluable and the intent-to-treat populations, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were similar in the ceftobiprole and comparator treatment arms (clinical cure rate, 90.5% [439 of 485 patients] and 90.2% [220 of 244 patients] in the clinically evaluable population, respectively; 81.9% [448 of 547 patients] and 80.8% [227 of 281 patients] in the intent-to-treat population, respectively). Clinical cure rates in ceftobiprole-treated patients ranged from 86.2% (125 of 145 patients) among those with diabetes who had foot infections to 93.0% (80 of 86 patients) among those with cellulitis. Among patients treated with ceftobiprole, clinical cure rates were similar among patients from whom gram-negative bacteria were isolated (87.9% [109 of 124 patients]) and among patients from whom gram-positive bacteria were isolated (91.8% [292 of 318 patients]) and were not statistically different from the clinical cure rates among comparator-treated patients (89.7% [61 of 68 patients] and 90.3% [149 of 165 patients], respectively). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were similar. Conclusions. Ceftobiprole monotherapy is as effective as vancomycin plus ceftazidime for treating patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Arbeit, RD
    Maki, D
    Tally, FP
    Campanaro, E
    Eisenstein, BI
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) : 1673 - 1681
  • [22] Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms
    Stryjewski, Martin E.
    Graham, Donald R.
    Wilson, Samuel E.
    O'Riordan, William
    Young, David
    Lentnek, Arnold
    Ross, Douglas P.
    Fowler, Vance G.
    Hopkins, Alan
    Friedland, H. David
    Barriere, Steven L.
    Kitt, Michael M.
    Corey, G. Ralph
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (11) : 1683 - 1693
  • [23] Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
    Kimko, Holly
    Murthy, Bindu
    Xu, Xu
    Nandy, Partha
    Strauss, Richard
    Noel, Gary J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (03) : 1228 - 1230
  • [24] Vancomycin Combined With Clindamycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin-Structure Infections
    Wargo, Kurt A.
    McCreary, Erin K.
    English, Thomas M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 61 (07) : 1148 - 1154
  • [25] Consensus document on controversial issues in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Pan, Angelo
    Cauda, Roberto
    Concia, Ercole
    Esposito, Silvano
    Sganga, Gabriele
    Stefani, Stefania
    Nicastri, Emanuele
    Lauria, Francesco N.
    Carosi, Giampiero
    Moroni, Mauro
    Ippolito, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 14 : S39 - S53
  • [26] Integrated Analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Studies to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infection
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Wilcox, Mark
    Talbot, George H.
    Friedland, H. David
    Baculik, Tanya
    Witherell, Gary W.
    Critchley, Ian
    Das, Anita F.
    Thye, Dirk
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 51 (06) : 641 - 650
  • [27] CANVAS 2: the second Phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Talbot, George H.
    Thye, Dirk
    Friedland, David
    Baculik, Tanya
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 : iv53 - iv65
  • [28] CANVAS 1: the first Phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    Talbot, George H.
    Thye, Dirk
    Friedland, David
    Baculik, Tanya
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 : iv41 - iv51
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study
    Pullman, J.
    Gardovskis, J.
    Farley, B.
    Sun, E.
    Quintas, M.
    Lawrence, L.
    Ling, R.
    Cammarata, S.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (12) : 3471 - 3480
  • [30] Daptomycin for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from a randomized, controlled trial comparing daptomycin with vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins for complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Lipsky, BA
    Stoutenburgh, U
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 55 (02) : 240 - 245