Carbon footprint of poultry production farms in South Georgia: A case study

被引:5
|
作者
Dunkley, C. S. [1 ]
Fairchild, B. D. [1 ]
Ritz, C. W. [1 ]
Kiepper, B. H. [1 ]
Lacy, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Poultry Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH | 2015年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
greenhouse gas; poultry farms; carbon footprint; GREENHOUSE-GAS; EMISSIONS; AMMONIA;
D O I
10.3382/japr/pfu005
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A study was conducted in South Georgia to assess the carbon footprint of poultry farms. The study included broiler grow-out farms, pullet farms, and breeder farms from one commercial broiler complex. Data collection included the fuel and electricity bills from each farm, house size and age, flock size and number of flocks per year, and manure management. Emissions were calculated using a greenhouse gas (GHG) calculation tool. The carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane (CH4) emissions were computed and a carbon footprint determined. Carbon footprint comparisons were made based on house construction and age. Based on these results, an evaluation of the mechanical sources of emissions showed that approximately 96% of the emissions from the broiler and pullet farms were from propane use, while only 3.9% of the total mechanical emissions from breeder farms were from propane use. On breeder farms, 83% of mechanical GHG emissions were the result of electricity use, while the pullet and broiler grow-out farms accounted for 2.9 and 2.7%, respectively, of the total mechanical emissions from electricity use. The data collected from the farms and entered into the GHG calculation tool revealed that breeder houses had higher levels of CH4 emissions from manure management when compared to emissions from broiler and pullet houses. Even though the GHG emissions from poultry production farms were minimal compared to other animal production farms, the different sources of emissions were identified, thereby enabling the farmer to target specific areas for mitigation.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:73 / 79
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Case Study of Carbon Footprint on Liquor Packaging
    Fu Yabo
    Xu Wencai
    Jiang Yanru
    Zhou Ge
    ADVANCES IN PRINTING AND PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 262 : 577 - 580
  • [32] The carbon footprint of government health department fleet vehicles in Johannesburg, South Africa - a case study
    Elimi, Ibrahim
    Stoffberg, Gerrit Hendrik
    SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 105 (02) : 242 - 261
  • [33] Social capital on poultry farms in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    Lestari, V. Sri
    Natsir
    Patrick, I. W.
    Ali, H. M.
    Asya, M.
    Sirajuddin, S. N.
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IN THE TROPICS (IC-FSSAT), 2018, 157
  • [34] A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms
    O'Brien, D.
    Capper, J. L.
    Garnsworthy, P. C.
    Grainger, C.
    Shalloo, L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (03) : 1835 - 1851
  • [35] Carbon footprint of milk produced at Italian buffalo farms
    Pirlo, G.
    Terzano, G.
    Pacelli, C.
    Abeni, F.
    Care, S.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2014, 161 : 176 - 184
  • [36] CASE STUDY: Evaluation of cooling in 3 grazing dairy farms in Georgia, USA
    Rivas, R. M. Orellana
    Bernard, J. K.
    Tao, S.
    APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 35 (06): : 634 - 640
  • [37] Accounting for Carbon Footprint Flows in Wine Production Process. Case Study in Spanish Winery
    Marco-Fondevila, Miguel
    Moneva, Jose M.
    Llena-Macarulla, Fernando
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (23): : 1 - 13
  • [38] The value of poultry litter to crop producers in South Georgia.
    Dunkley, C. S.
    Cunningham, D. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 189 - 190
  • [39] CARBON FOOTPRINT OF MILK PRODUCTION
    Jejcic, Viktor
    Al Mansour, Fouad
    AKTUALNI ZADACI MEHANIZACIJE POLJOPRIVREDE: ZBORNIK RADOVA, 2016, 44 : 459 - 467
  • [40] Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options
    Naranjo, Anna M.
    Sieverding, Heidi
    Clay, David
    Kebreab, Ermias
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):