Direct next-generation sequencing analysis using endometrial liquid-based cytology specimens for rapid cancer genomic profiling

被引:14
|
作者
Akahane, Toshiaki [1 ,2 ]
Kitazono, Ikumi [3 ]
Kobayashi, Yusuke [4 ]
Nishida-Kirita, Yukari [3 ]
Yamaguchi, Tomomi [5 ]
Yanazume, Shintaro [6 ]
Tabata, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kobayashi, Hiroaki [4 ,6 ]
Tanimoto, Akihide [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Pathol, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 8908544, Japan
[2] Kagoshima Univ Hosp, Ctr Human Genome & Gene Anal, Kagoshima, Japan
[3] Kagoshima Univ Hosp, Unit Surg Pathol, Kagoshima, Japan
[4] Kagoshima Univ, Adv Canc Med Gynecol Canc, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Kagoshima, Japan
[5] Hokuto Hosp, Dept Pathol, Lab Canc Med Sci, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
[6] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Kagoshima, Japan
关键词
cancer panel; endometrial cancer; liquid-based cytology; next-generation sequencing; rapid genomic profiling; SMEARS; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1002/dc.24841
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Genomic examination of cytology specimens is often performed on cell blocks or conventional smears rather than on liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens. Since LBC specimens preserve high-quality DNA, cancer genome profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is also attainable from residual LBC specimens. One of the advantages of using LBC specimens for NGS is that it allows direct extraction of DNA from residual specimens, avoiding a sacrifice of smear slides and minimizing genomic profiling processing time. Methods Endometrial LBC specimens were subjected to NGS analysis to validate the practicality of rapid cancer genomic profiling in a pathology laboratory. The extracted DNA was subjected to NGS using a customized cancer gene panel comprising 56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions. The workflow strategy was defined, and the processing time estimated for specimen sampling, cell counting, NGS run, and genome profiling. Results NGS analysis of most LBC specimens revealed somatic mutations, tumor mutation burden, and microsatellite instability, which were almost identical to those obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. The processing time for direct NGS analysis and cancer genomic profiling of the residual LBC specimens was approximately 5 days. Conclusion The residual LBC specimens collected using endometrial cytology were verified to carry a high tumor fraction for NGS analysis and could serve as an alternate source for rapid molecular classification and diagnosis of endometrial cancers, as a routine process in a pathology laboratory.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1078 / 1085
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF LIQUID-BASED ENDOMETRIAL CYTOLOGY IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER DETECTION
    Sorbi, F.
    Fambrini, M.
    Sisti, G.
    Pieralli, A.
    Guaschino, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [42] Mutation analysis of endometrial cancer in a population-based study by targeted next-generation sequencing
    Chen, Maxine
    Crous-Bou, Marta
    Downing, Michael J.
    Busch, Evan L.
    Glass, Kimberley
    Prescott, Jennifer
    Mutter, George L.
    De Vivo, Immaculata
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [43] Genomic Profiling of Ossifying Fibroma of the Craniofacial Bones by Next-Generation Sequencing
    Bahceci, Dorukhan
    Grenert, James
    Jordan, Richard
    Horvai, Andrew
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S29 - S29
  • [44] Liquid-Based Memory Devices for Next-Generation Computing
    Kim, Dongshin
    Lee, Jang-Sik
    ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2023, 5 (02) : 664 - 673
  • [45] Usefulness of liquid-based cytology in hormone receptor analysis of breast cancer specimens
    Rieko Nishimura
    Kenjiro Aogi
    Tamami Yamamoto
    Daisuke Takabatake
    Seiki Takashima
    Norihiro Teramoto
    Akihiro Kagawa
    Sachiko Morita
    Virchows Archiv, 2011, 458 : 153 - 158
  • [46] Rapid whole-genome mutational profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies
    Smith, Douglas R.
    Quinlan, Aaron R.
    Peckham, Heather E.
    Makowsky, Kathryn
    Tao, Wei
    Woolf, Betty
    Shen, Lei
    Donahue, William F.
    Tusneem, Nadeem
    Stromberg, Michael P.
    Stewart, Donald A.
    Zhang, Lu
    Ranade, Swati S.
    Warner, Jason B.
    Lee, Clarence C.
    Coleman, Brittney E.
    Zhang, Zheng
    McLaughlin, Stephen F.
    Malek, Joel A.
    Sorenson, Jon M.
    Blanchard, Alan P.
    Chapman, Jarrod
    Hillman, David
    Chen, Feng
    Rokhsar, Daniel S.
    McKernan, Kevin J.
    Jeffries, Thomas W.
    Marth, Gabor T.
    Richardson, Paul M.
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (10) : 1638 - 1642
  • [47] Genetic alterations in endometrial cancer by targeted next-generation sequencing
    Chang, Ya-Sian
    Huang, Hsien-Da
    Yeh, Kun-Tu
    Chang, Jan-Gowth
    EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2016, 100 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [48] Usefulness of liquid-based cytology in hormone receptor analysis of breast cancer specimens
    Nishimura, Rieko
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Yamamoto, Tamami
    Takabatake, Daisuke
    Takashima, Seiki
    Teramoto, Norihiro
    Kagawa, Akihiro
    Morita, Sachiko
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 458 (02) : 153 - 158
  • [49] Multi-laboratory proficiency testing of clinical cancer genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing
    Zhong, Qing
    Wagner, Ulrich
    Kurt, Henriette
    Molinari, Francesca
    Cathomas, Gieri
    Komminoth, Paul
    Barman-Aksozen, Jasmin
    Schneider-Yin, Xiaoye
    Rey, Jean-Philippe
    Vassella, Erik
    Rogel, Uwe
    Diebold, Joachim
    McKee, Thomas
    Jochum, Wolfram
    Kashofer, Karl
    Hofman, Paul
    Zischka, Melanie
    Moch, Holger
    Rechsteiner, Markus
    Wild, Peter J.
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 214 (07) : 957 - 963
  • [50] Rapid Genomic Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in the Age of Next-Generation Sequencing
    Tsang, Chi-Ching
    Teng, Jade L. L.
    Lau, Susanna K. P.
    Woo, Patrick C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2021, 7 (08)