Comparing calculation methods of state transfer matrix in Markov chain models for indoor contaminant transport

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Mengqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [4 ]
Xue, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Lumeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Huan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Meng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Low Carbon & Green Bldg, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[4] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Div Sustainable Bldg, Brinellvagen 23, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Markov chain model; State transfer matrix; Contaminant transport; CFD; TRANSIENT PARTICLE-TRANSPORT; PARTICULATE SYSTEMS; COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS; FLUID-DYNAMICS; AIR-FLOW; DEPOSITION; TIME; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSMISSION; POLLUTANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108515
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fast and accurate prediction of indoor airborne contaminant distribution is of great significance to the safety and health of occupants. Several Markov chain models have been developed and proved to be the potential solutions. However, there is a lack of comparison in terms of accuracy, computing cost, and robustness among these models, which limits their practical application. To this end, this study compared the performance of three Markov chain models, in which the state transfer matrix was calculated based on different principles, i.e., Markov chain model with flux-based method, with Lagrangian tracking, and with set theory approach. The investigation was conducted in a 2D ventilated cavity and a two-zone ventilated chamber. The simulation by Eulerian model for contaminant and experimental data were used as the benchmarks for the 2D and 3D cases, respectively. It is revealed that all three Markov chain models can provide a correct prediction. In the 2D case, the Markov chain model with set theory approach is the most accurate, followed by Lagrangian tracking. In the 3D case, the accuracy of Markov chain models with flux-based method and Lagrangian tracking is comparable. The Markov chain model with Lagrangian tracking is the fastest, and the time step size in this model can be relatively large. Finally, the selection guideline is given for the application of Markov chain models in different scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Likelihood estimation for stochastic compartmental models using Markov chain methods
    Gavin J. Gibson
    Eric Renshaw
    Statistics and Computing, 2001, 11 : 347 - 358
  • [32] Dynamic conditional independence models and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
    Berzuini, C
    Best, NG
    Gilks, WR
    Larizza, C
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (440) : 1403 - 1412
  • [33] Estimating parameters in stochastic compartmental models using Markov chain methods
    Gibson, GJ
    Renshaw, E
    IMA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS APPLIED IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (01): : 19 - 40
  • [34] Mineralogical compositions of aquifer matrix as necessary initial conditions in reactive contaminant transport models
    Zhu, C
    Burden, DS
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2001, 51 (3-4) : 145 - 161
  • [35] Finite-state markov chain models for the intensity of nakagami fading
    Juang M.A.
    Pursley M.B.
    International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 2013, 20 (2) : 95 - 102
  • [36] Fitting Markov chain models to discrete state series such as DNA sequences
    Avery, PJ
    Henderson, DA
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1999, 48 : 53 - 61
  • [37] Markov chain Monte Carlo in conditionally Gaussian state space models
    Carter, CK
    Kohn, R
    BIOMETRIKA, 1996, 83 (03) : 589 - 601
  • [38] Comparing Policies for Case Scheduling Within 1 Day of Surgery by Markov Chain Models
    Shi, Pengyi
    Dexter, Franklin
    Epstein, Richard H.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (02): : 526 - 538
  • [39] Fuzzy time series forecasting Comparing Markov-Chain and Percentage Change models
    Darzi, Fatemeh Hasantabar
    Khoshnazar, Narges
    Eslami, Mehrdad
    2015 4th Iranian Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems (CFIS), 2015,
  • [40] Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of likelihoods in genetic linkage studies.
    George, AW
    Bogdan, M
    Wijsman, EM
    Thompson, EA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 69 (04) : 411 - 411