Comparing calculation methods of state transfer matrix in Markov chain models for indoor contaminant transport

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Mengqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [4 ]
Xue, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Lumeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Huan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Meng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Low Carbon & Green Bldg, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[4] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Div Sustainable Bldg, Brinellvagen 23, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Markov chain model; State transfer matrix; Contaminant transport; CFD; TRANSIENT PARTICLE-TRANSPORT; PARTICULATE SYSTEMS; COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS; FLUID-DYNAMICS; AIR-FLOW; DEPOSITION; TIME; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSMISSION; POLLUTANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108515
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fast and accurate prediction of indoor airborne contaminant distribution is of great significance to the safety and health of occupants. Several Markov chain models have been developed and proved to be the potential solutions. However, there is a lack of comparison in terms of accuracy, computing cost, and robustness among these models, which limits their practical application. To this end, this study compared the performance of three Markov chain models, in which the state transfer matrix was calculated based on different principles, i.e., Markov chain model with flux-based method, with Lagrangian tracking, and with set theory approach. The investigation was conducted in a 2D ventilated cavity and a two-zone ventilated chamber. The simulation by Eulerian model for contaminant and experimental data were used as the benchmarks for the 2D and 3D cases, respectively. It is revealed that all three Markov chain models can provide a correct prediction. In the 2D case, the Markov chain model with set theory approach is the most accurate, followed by Lagrangian tracking. In the 3D case, the accuracy of Markov chain models with flux-based method and Lagrangian tracking is comparable. The Markov chain model with Lagrangian tracking is the fastest, and the time step size in this model can be relatively large. Finally, the selection guideline is given for the application of Markov chain models in different scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survey of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods in Light Transport Simulation
    Sik, Martin
    Krivanek, Jaroslav
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2020, 26 (04) : 1821 - 1840
  • [23] Building Markov state models using optimal transport theory
    Dixit, Purushottam D.
    Dill, Ken A.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 150 (05):
  • [24] Insights of hSERT transport mechanism revealed by Markov state models
    da Silva, Leticia Alves
    Gradisch, Ralph
    Lazzarin, Erika
    Szollosi, Daniel
    Stockner, Thomas
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 121 (03) : 429A - 429A
  • [25] The application of improved genetic algorithm in the Markov state transition matrix to SME technical efficiency and scale revenue calculation methods
    School of Economic and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Nantong Str. 145, Harbin, China
    不详
    Int. J. Future Gener. Commun. Networking, 9 (127-136):
  • [26] CALCULATION OF MARKOV PARAMETERS FROM THE TRANSFER-FUNCTION MATRIX OF MIMO SYSTEMS
    ALMUTHAIRI, NF
    BINGULAC, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1995, 26 (04) : 787 - 798
  • [27] Rapid simulation of airborne contaminant transport: Coupling concentration response factor method into a Markov chain model
    Hu, Mengqiang
    Yan, Lu
    Liu, Huan
    Liu, Lumeng
    Liu, Meng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2022, 185
  • [28] Application of stochastic methods to creating models of contaminant transport and dispersion in rivers and groundwater
    Bardsley, WE
    MODSIM 2003: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOLS 1-4: VOL 1: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 1; VOL 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 2; VOL 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS; VOL 4: GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2003, : 326 - 331
  • [29] REVERSIBLE JUMP MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO METHODS AND SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS IN HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS
    Paroli, R.
    Spezia, L.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2010, 52 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [30] Likelihood estimation for stochastic compartmental models using Markov chain methods
    Gibson, GJ
    Renshaw, E
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2001, 11 (04) : 347 - 358