Applying the software evaluation framework 'SEF' to the software development life cycle

被引:1
|
作者
Wong, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
software evaluation; software quality; metrics; empirical software engineering; human factors; requirements engineering;
D O I
10.1109/ISESE.2003.1237989
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The primary objective of this paper is to present an exploratory study on the different measurements used at different milestones throughout a development project. The paper presents the results of a study, which uses qualitative techniques to investigate the cognitive structures appropriate to the requirements phase and the implementation phase of a software development cycle. The study involved an e-commerce project, and two stakeholder groups, the users and the developers. The results show that measurements between the different phases are not the same, though the motivation behind the choice of these measurements is the same for a stakeholder group. The study also finds that the two groups of stakeholders are very similar in the measurements they choose for evaluating requirements documents, however, the motivation behind their choice of these measurements differ between the stakeholder groups. These results are a contrast to that of the implementation phase. These results, whilst still exploratory are valuable as they highlight the differences and similarities of not just the stakeholder groups, but more importantly the choice of measurements at the different milestones. As a result of this study, the Software Evaluation Framework has been expanded to consider the many milestones in a development cycle. The result of this will be a framework, to guide practitioners as they evaluate, test, review, walkthrough, or inspect the different artifacts that the many milestones deliver.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:281 / 290
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Software Development Life Cycle Security Issues
    Kaur, Daljit
    Kaur, Parminder
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS AND MODELS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICM2ST-11), 2011, 1414
  • [22] The life-cycle approach to software development
    Pilkington, R
    MANUFACTURING CHEMIST, 1996, 67 (01): : 28 - &
  • [23] Applying a Software Development Product Cycle to Library Technology Adoption and Development
    Costello, Laura
    JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 58 (04) : 334 - 345
  • [24] A Framework for Supporting the Software Architecture Evaluation Process in Global Software Development
    Babar, Muhammad Ali
    ICGSE 2009: FOURTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 93 - 102
  • [25] Incorporating Software Performance Engineering Methods and Practices into the Software Development Life Cycle
    Bondi, Andre B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM/SPEC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING (ICPE'16), 2016, : 327 - 330
  • [26] Software metrics for policy-driven software development life cycle automation
    Borodaev, Leonid
    Smedinga, Rein
    Telea, Alex
    Groenboom, Rix
    2018 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TESTING, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION WORKSHOPS (ICSTW), 2018, : 169 - 174
  • [27] Early Risk Assessment in Software Development Life Cycle Using Software Metrics
    Hakizabera, Aline Uwera
    Ohsato, Ario
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2010, : 122 - 128
  • [28] SOFTWARE LIFE-CYCLE SUPPORT - DECISION BASED SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT
    WILD, C
    MALY, K
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 12 : 72 - 78
  • [29] Software security checklist for the software life cycle
    Gilliam, DP
    Wolfe, TL
    Sherif, JS
    Bishop, M
    TWELFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS ON ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR COLLABORATIVE ENTERPRISES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 243 - 248
  • [30] The Software Life Cycle Support Environment (SLCSE): A computer based framework for developing software systems
    Strelich, Tom
    ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 1988, 24 (02): : 35 - 44