Software metrics for policy-driven software development life cycle automation

被引：0

作者：

Borodaev, Leonid ^{[1
]}

Smedinga, Rein ^{[1
]}

Telea, Alex ^{[1
]}

Groenboom, Rix ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Groningen, Netherlands

[2] Parasoft, Groningen, Netherlands

来源：

2018 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TESTING, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION WORKSHOPS (ICSTW) | 2018年

关键词：

NFR; software quality; continuous delivery; policy;

D O I：

10.1109/ICSTW.2018.00047

中图分类号：

TP31 [计算机软件];

学科分类号：

081202 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

Automation of SDLC requires continuous verification of compliance of the software product under construction to a set of expectations about its quality. We define a policy as an expectation about some aspects of software quality that is expressed as a collection of non-functional requirements (NFRs), compliance to which can be potentially measured. The results of such measurements can be used to verify whether the product meets the expectation set about it. In this paper, we discuss existing NFR taxonomies and propose mapping of software metrics to twelve NFRs. We then propose a model for reliability prediction using publicly available quality metrics for several open source projects.

引用

页码：169 / 174

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] Mitigating Software Vulnerabilities through Secure Software Development with a Policy-Driven Waterfall Model
Hussain, Shariq
Anwaar, Haris
Sultan, Kashif
Mahmud, Umar
Farooqui, Sherjeel
Karamat, Tehmina
Toure, Ibrahima Kalil
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2024, 2024
[2] Policy-driven licensing model for component software
Zhao, Q
Zhou, Y
Perry, M
[J]. IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON POLICIES FOR DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 219 - 228
[3] Early Risk Assessment in Software Development Life Cycle Using Software Metrics
Hakizabera, Aline Uwera
Ohsato, Ario
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2010, : 122 - 128
[4] A policy-driven approach for software-as-services customization
Zhang, Kuo
Zhang, Xin
Sun, Wei
Liang, Haiqi
Huang, Ying
Zeng, Liangzhao
Liu, Xuanzhe
[J]. 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE TECHNOLOGY/4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE COMPUTING, E-COMMERCE AND E-SERVICES, 2007, : 123 - 130
[5] Catalog of metrics for assessing security risks of software throughout the software development life cycle
Sultan, Khalid
En-Nouaary, Abdeslam
Hanaou-Lhadj, Abdelwahab
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SECURITY AND ASSURANCE, 2008, : 461 - 465
[6] Software defects estimation using metrics of early phases of software development life cycle
Kumar C.
Yadav D.K.
[J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, 8 (Suppl 4) : 2109 - 2117
[7] Software Defined Membrane: Policy-Driven Edge and Internet of Things Security
Villari, Massimo
Fazio, Maria
Dustdar, Schahram
Rana, Omer
Chen, Lydia
Ranjan, Rajiv
[J]. IEEE CLOUD COMPUTING, 2017, 4 (04): : 92 - 99
[8] Mapping the field of software life cycle security metrics
Morrison, Patrick
Moye, David
Pandita, Rahul
Williams, Laurie
[J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 102 : 146 - 159
[9] Software metrics for agile software development
Kunz, Martin
Dumke, Reiner R.
Zenker, Niko
[J]. ASWEC 2008: 19TH AUSTRALIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 673 - 678
[10] Software development life cycle model to ensure software quality
Kececi, N
Modarres, M
[J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 1104 - 1110

← 1 2 3 4 5 →