Comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anaesthesia for patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy without intubation

被引:9
|
作者
Wiel, E
Davette, M
Carpentier, L
Fayoux, P
Erb, C
Chevalier, D
Vallet, B
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Lille, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, F-59037 Lille, France
[2] Univ Hosp Lille, ENT Facil, F-59037 Lille, France
关键词
adults; anaesthetic techniques; direct laryngoscopy; analgesics opioid; alfentanil; remifentanil; surgery; ENT;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeg198
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Remifentanil and alfentanil are opioids often used during direct laryngoscopy (DL). This prospective, randomized study compared these agents with respect to haemodynamic and Bispectral Index (BIS) responses, glottic visualization, and rapidity of recovery (spontaneous ventilation, eye opening) in DL without intubation. Methods. A total of 60 patients undergoing DL were randomized into two groups: remifentanil (R) and alfentanil (A). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and the opioid was administered 1 min later (R=2 mug kg(-1) or A=30 mug kg(-1) over 30 s). DL was commenced 1 min after (corresponding to 3 min after the beginning of induction). Glottic visualization, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, spontaneous ventilation recovery, and eye opening were recorded. Results. During DL, mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased by 6% in the R group vs 20% in the A group (P<0.05) when compared with post-induction values without affecting heart rate or BIS. No significant difference was observed between groups with respect to glottic exposure, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, and spontaneous ventilation recovery (mean (sem) 3.8 (0.6) min, R group vs 3.2 (0.7) min, A group, NS) or eye opening (7.1 (1.1) min, R group vs 7.4 (0.9) min, A group, NS). Thirty minutes after postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, MAP returned to its pre-induction value in the R group (104 (3) vs 109 (3) at baseline, NS), whereas in the A group MAP remained significantly lower at this time point (96 (4) vs 106 (3) at baseline, P<0.05). Conclusion. This study showed that only remifentanil prevented MAP increase without adverse effects such as bradycardia during DL, and prevented MAP decrease 30 min after PACU admission.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:421 / 423
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the Effects of Remifentanil and Alfentanil in Endotracheal Intubation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mohebat Vali
    Sarvenaz Salahi
    Ahmad Ahmadipour
    Saina Salahi
    Samira Safari
    Seyyed Mohammad Amin Kashani
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 4 (1)
  • [42] A comparison of recovery following remifentanil-desflurane and remifentanil-sevoflurane anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing craniotomy
    Venkataswamy, R
    Varma, MK
    Williamson, S
    ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 61 (01) : 104 - 104
  • [43] Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: A multicentre study
    Okamoto, Hiroshi
    Goto, Tadahiro
    Wong, Zoie S. Y.
    Hagiwara, Yusuke
    Watase, Hiroko
    Hasegawa, Kohei
    RESUSCITATION, 2019, 136 : 70 - 77
  • [44] CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO TRACHEAL INTUBATION - A COMPARISON OF DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY AND FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION
    FINFER, SR
    MACKENZIE, SIP
    SADDLER, JM
    WATKINS, TGL
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1989, 17 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [45] A clinical comparison of remifentanil or alfentanil in propofol-anesthetized cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
    Padilha, Samanta T.
    Steagall, Paulo V. M.
    Monteiro, Beatriz P.
    Kahvegian, Marcia A. P.
    Ubukata, Rodrigo
    Rodrigues, Edilberto O.
    Rosa, Andre Leguthe
    Aguiar, Antonio J. A.
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2011, 13 (10) : 738 - 743
  • [46] McGrath Video Laryngoscopy Facilitates Routine Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Comparison With Macintosh Laryngoscopy
    Kwak, Hyun-Jeong
    Lee, Seong-Yeon
    Lee, Sook-Young
    Cho, Sang-Hyun
    Kim, Hong-Soon
    Kim, Jong-Yeop
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (02) : 256 - 261
  • [47] A COMPARISON OF REMIFENTANIL AND ALFENTANIL DURING NITROUS-NARCOTIC ANESTHESIA
    MONK, TG
    BATENHORST, RL
    FOLGER, WH
    KIRKHAM, AJT
    LEMON, DJ
    MARTIN, KJ
    VENKER, DC
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1994, 78 (02): : U160 - U160
  • [48] A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil for use with propofol in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery
    Ahonen, J
    Olkkola, KT
    Verkkala, K
    Heikkinen, L
    Järvinen, A
    Salmenperä, M
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (06): : 1269 - 1274
  • [49] THE COMPARISON OF ATRACURIUM AND REMIFENTANIL EFFECT ON JAW RELAXATION AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION CONDITION WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY
    Yazdi, Bijan
    Khalili, Mohammad
    Dadashpour, Niloufar
    Nasab, Seyed Masoud Mousavi
    Khabiri, Mohammad
    Eraghi, Majid Golestani
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2016, 32 : 1029 - 1032
  • [50] A comparison of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Kim, Jin-Tae
    Kim, Hee-Soo
    Kim, Chong-Sung
    Kim, Seong-Deok
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (04) : 417 - 421