Comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anaesthesia for patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy without intubation

被引:9
|
作者
Wiel, E
Davette, M
Carpentier, L
Fayoux, P
Erb, C
Chevalier, D
Vallet, B
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Lille, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, F-59037 Lille, France
[2] Univ Hosp Lille, ENT Facil, F-59037 Lille, France
关键词
adults; anaesthetic techniques; direct laryngoscopy; analgesics opioid; alfentanil; remifentanil; surgery; ENT;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeg198
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Remifentanil and alfentanil are opioids often used during direct laryngoscopy (DL). This prospective, randomized study compared these agents with respect to haemodynamic and Bispectral Index (BIS) responses, glottic visualization, and rapidity of recovery (spontaneous ventilation, eye opening) in DL without intubation. Methods. A total of 60 patients undergoing DL were randomized into two groups: remifentanil (R) and alfentanil (A). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and the opioid was administered 1 min later (R=2 mug kg(-1) or A=30 mug kg(-1) over 30 s). DL was commenced 1 min after (corresponding to 3 min after the beginning of induction). Glottic visualization, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, spontaneous ventilation recovery, and eye opening were recorded. Results. During DL, mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased by 6% in the R group vs 20% in the A group (P<0.05) when compared with post-induction values without affecting heart rate or BIS. No significant difference was observed between groups with respect to glottic exposure, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, and spontaneous ventilation recovery (mean (sem) 3.8 (0.6) min, R group vs 3.2 (0.7) min, A group, NS) or eye opening (7.1 (1.1) min, R group vs 7.4 (0.9) min, A group, NS). Thirty minutes after postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, MAP returned to its pre-induction value in the R group (104 (3) vs 109 (3) at baseline, NS), whereas in the A group MAP remained significantly lower at this time point (96 (4) vs 106 (3) at baseline, P<0.05). Conclusion. This study showed that only remifentanil prevented MAP increase without adverse effects such as bradycardia during DL, and prevented MAP decrease 30 min after PACU admission.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:421 / 423
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant: Comparaison between alfentanil/propofol, remifentanil/propofol, or propofol/remifentanil
    Trabold, F
    Casetta, M
    Samii, K
    Benhamou, D
    Sitbon, P
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U128 - U128
  • [22] Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation
    Lee, Jeong Han
    Kim, Hyojoong
    Kim, Hyun-Tae
    Kim, Myoung-Hun
    Cho, Kwangrae
    Lim, Se Hun
    Lee, Kun Moo
    Kim, Young-Jae
    Shin, Chee-Mahn
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 63 (02) : 124 - 129
  • [23] CIRCULATORY CHANGES DURING DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION - INFLUENCE OF DURATION OF LARYNGOSCOPY WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR LIDOCAINE
    STOELTING, RK
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1977, 47 (04) : 381 - 384
  • [24] Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients
    Jungbauer, A.
    Schumann, M.
    Brunkhorst, V.
    Boergers, A.
    Groeben, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (04) : 546 - 550
  • [25] Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department
    John Constantine Sakles
    Asad E. Patanwala
    Jarrod M. Mosier
    John Michael Dicken
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2014, 9 : 93 - 98
  • [26] Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department
    Sakles, John Constantine
    Patanwala, Asad E.
    Mosier, Jarrod M.
    Dicken, John Michael
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 9 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [27] Comparison of GlideScope Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Neonates
    Tao, Bingdong
    Liu, Kun
    Zhao, Ping
    Wang, Dandan
    Liu, Yiming
    Yin, Hong
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (02): : 482 - 486
  • [28] Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery
    Meininger, D.
    Strouhal, U.
    Weber, C. F.
    Fogl, D.
    Holzer, L.
    Zacharowski, K.
    Byhahn, C.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2010, 59 (09): : 806 - 811
  • [29] Comparison of propofol-alfentanil and propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
    Cicek, M
    Koroglu, A
    Demirbilek, S
    Teksan, H
    Ersoy, MO
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 22 (09) : 683 - 688
  • [30] Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation
    Hansel, Jan
    Rogers, Andrew M.
    Lewis, Sharon R.
    Cook, Tim M.
    Smith, Andrew F.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (04):