Single-inhaler triple vs single-inhaler dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

被引:13
|
作者
Long, Huanyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Hongxuan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Janssens, Jean-Paul [5 ]
Guo, Yanfei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Geriatr Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Geriatr, Beijing Inst Geriatr, Natl Ctr Gerontol,Natl Hlth Commiss,Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Cardiol, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Pulm Dis, Dept Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
COPD; Triple therapy; Mortality; Meta-analysis; PARALLEL-GROUP; LUNG-FUNCTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; COPD; ADHERENCE; ASTHMA; PERSISTENCE; MULTIPLE; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12931-021-01794-w
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In some RCTs comparing triple therapy with dual therapy in COPD, there might be a bias resulting from the use of multiple inhaler devices. This meta-analysis included only RCTs that compared ICS/LABA/LAMA vs. LABA/LAMA or ICS/LABA using a single device. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to investigate the effect of single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD. The primary end points were the effect of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with single-inhaler dual therapy on all-cause mortality, the risk of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), and some safety endpoints. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the quality of each randomized trial and the risk of bias. Results A total of 25,171 patients suffering from COPD were recruited for the 6 studies. This meta-analysis indicated that single-inhaler triple therapy resulted in a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality than LABA/LAMA FDC (risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.88). Single-inhaler triple therapy reduced the risk of exacerbation and prolonged the time to first exacerbation compared with single-inhaler dual therapy. The FEV1 increased significantly more under single-inhaler triple therapy than under ICS/LABA FDC (mean difference, 103.4 ml; 95% CI 64.65-142.15). The risk of pneumonia was, however, significantly higher with ICS/LAMA/LABA FDC than with LABA/LAMA FDC (risk ratio, 1.55; 95% CI 1.35-1.80). Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that single-inhaler triple therapy is effective in reducing the risk of death of any cause and of moderate or severe exacerbation in COPD patients. However, the risk of pneumonia is higher with ICS/LAMA/LABA FDC than with LABA/LAMA FDC. Trial registration PROSPERO #CRD42020186726.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] REDUCED CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE EXACERBATIONS AFTER SWITCH FROM DUAL THERAPY TO SINGLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY IN A REAL-WORLD HEALTH CARE SETTING IN THE US
    McCormack, Meredith C.
    Noorduyn, Stephen G.
    Gronroos, Noelle
    Lee, Lydia
    Johnson, Mary
    Wrobleski, Kristin
    Veeranki, Phani
    Ismaila, Afisi S.
    Igboekwe, Emmeline
    Paczkowski, Rosirene
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 4942A - 4943A
  • [32] Chinese subgroup results from a study comparing single-inhaler triple therapy with dual therapy in COPD
    Liu, Cindy
    Luo, Linda
    Du, Xin
    Xiao, Lochy
    Goh, Aik Han
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [33] Comparative efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for COPD: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yixuan
    Hu, Hao
    Leung, Siu-wai
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [34] When single-inhaler triple therapy is a preferred option in asthma management? Comment
    Al-Moamary, Mohamed S.
    Al-Lehebi, Riyad
    Idrees, Majdy M.
    Zeitouni, Mohammed O.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (04) : 185 - 188
  • [35] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using the FULFIL Trial: A Spanish Perspective
    Schroeder, Melanie
    Benjamin, Nicole
    Atienza, Laura
    Biswas, Chandroday
    Martin, Alan
    Whalen, John D.
    Izquierdo Alonso, Jose Luis
    Riesco Miranda, Juan Antonio
    Jose Soler-Cataluna, Juan
    Huerta, Alicia
    Ismaila, Afisi S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2020, 15 : 1621 - 1632
  • [36] Single Triple vs Dual Inhaler Therapy
    Lipworth, Brian J.
    Kuo, Chris R. W.
    CHEST, 2019, 155 (05) : 1078 - 1079
  • [37] Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD patients in England following an exacerbation
    Ismaila, A.
    Wood, R.
    Czira, A.
    Banks, V
    Camidge, L.
    Massey, O.
    Sharma, R.
    Compton, C.
    Rothnie, K.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [38] THE IMPACT TRIAL: COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY (FF/UMEC/VI) VERSUS DUAL BRONCHODILATOR THERAPY (UMEC/VI) IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) IN SPAIN
    Vallejo-Aparicio, L. A.
    Paly, V. F.
    Schroeder, M.
    Martin, A.
    Risebrough, N.
    Abreu, C.
    Biswas, C.
    Izquierdo Alonso, J. L.
    Riesco Miranda, J. A.
    Soler Cataluna, J. J.
    Ismaila, A. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S878 - S878
  • [39] Efficacy and Safety of Single Inhaler Triple Therapy Versus Separate Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Liansheng
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Zhang, Ye
    Chen, Wenyu
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 44 (06) : 859 - +
  • [40] REAL-WORLD ADHERENCE TO SINGLE-INHALER VS MULTIPLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY AMONG PATIENTS WITH COPD IN A COMMERCIALLY INSURED US POPULATION
    Bogart, Michael
    Wu, Benjamin
    Germain, Guillaume
    Laliberte, Francois
    MacKnight, Sean
    Jung, Young
    Duh, Mei
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (04) : 1773A - 1774A