Single-inhaler triple vs single-inhaler dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

被引:13
|
作者
Long, Huanyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Hongxuan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Janssens, Jean-Paul [5 ]
Guo, Yanfei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Geriatr Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Geriatr, Beijing Inst Geriatr, Natl Ctr Gerontol,Natl Hlth Commiss,Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Cardiol, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Pulm Dis, Dept Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
COPD; Triple therapy; Mortality; Meta-analysis; PARALLEL-GROUP; LUNG-FUNCTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; COPD; ADHERENCE; ASTHMA; PERSISTENCE; MULTIPLE; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12931-021-01794-w
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In some RCTs comparing triple therapy with dual therapy in COPD, there might be a bias resulting from the use of multiple inhaler devices. This meta-analysis included only RCTs that compared ICS/LABA/LAMA vs. LABA/LAMA or ICS/LABA using a single device. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to investigate the effect of single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD. The primary end points were the effect of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with single-inhaler dual therapy on all-cause mortality, the risk of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), and some safety endpoints. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the quality of each randomized trial and the risk of bias. Results A total of 25,171 patients suffering from COPD were recruited for the 6 studies. This meta-analysis indicated that single-inhaler triple therapy resulted in a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality than LABA/LAMA FDC (risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.88). Single-inhaler triple therapy reduced the risk of exacerbation and prolonged the time to first exacerbation compared with single-inhaler dual therapy. The FEV1 increased significantly more under single-inhaler triple therapy than under ICS/LABA FDC (mean difference, 103.4 ml; 95% CI 64.65-142.15). The risk of pneumonia was, however, significantly higher with ICS/LAMA/LABA FDC than with LABA/LAMA FDC (risk ratio, 1.55; 95% CI 1.35-1.80). Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that single-inhaler triple therapy is effective in reducing the risk of death of any cause and of moderate or severe exacerbation in COPD patients. However, the risk of pneumonia is higher with ICS/LAMA/LABA FDC than with LABA/LAMA FDC. Trial registration PROSPERO #CRD42020186726.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-inhaler triple vs single-inhaler dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Huanyu Long
    Hongxuan Xu
    Jean-Paul Janssens
    Yanfei Guo
    Respiratory Research, 22
  • [2] Single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
    Langham, Sue
    Lewis, Jen
    Pooley, Nick
    Embleton, Nina
    Langham, Julia
    Han, MeiLan K.
    Chalmers, James D.
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [3] Single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
    Sue Langham
    Jen Lewis
    Nick Pooley
    Nina Embleton
    Julia Langham
    MeiLan K. Han
    James D. Chalmers
    Respiratory Research, 20
  • [4] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SINGLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD)
    Langham, S.
    Lewis, J.
    Pooley, N.
    Embleton, N.
    Langham, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S873 - S873
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY VS A DUAL BRONCHODILATOR FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) IN AUSTRALIA
    Schembri, S.
    Schroeder, M.
    Shah, D.
    Martin, A.
    Ndirangu, K.
    Risebrough, N.
    Thrasis, A.
    Bremner, P.
    Haberl, M.
    Ismaila, A.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2021, 26 : 119 - 119
  • [6] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE-INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY VS A DUAL BRONCHODILATOR FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) IN AUSTRALIA
    Schembri, S.
    Schroeder, M.
    Shah, D.
    Martin, A.
    Ndirangu, A.
    Risebrough, N.
    Thrasis, A.
    Bremner, P.
    Haberl, M.
    Ismaila, A.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2020, 25 : 145 - 145
  • [7] Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD
    Rolla, Giovanni
    Brussino, Luisa
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06): : 590 - 591
  • [8] The effects of single inhaler triple therapy vs single inhaler dual therapy or separate triple therapy for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Chen, Cheng-Hsin
    Lin, Charlotte Yu Hsuan
    Wang, Cheng-Yi
    Wang, Ya-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2019, 14 : 1539 - 1547
  • [9] Patient and Clinical Demographics of New Users to Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Benjamin Wu
    David Mannino
    George Mu
    Marjorie Stiegler
    Michael Bogart
    Pulmonary Therapy, 2022, 8 : 195 - 208
  • [10] Patient and Clinical Demographics of New Users to Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Wu, Benjamin
    Mannino, David
    Mu, George
    Stiegler, Marjorie
    Bogart, Michael
    PULMONARY THERAPY, 2022, 8 (02) : 195 - 208