Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states

被引:10
|
作者
Marami, Bahram [1 ,2 ]
Sirouspour, Shahin [3 ]
Ghoul, Suha [1 ,4 ]
Cepek, Jeremy [1 ,2 ]
Davidson, Sean R. H. [5 ]
Capson, David W. [6 ]
Trachtenberg, John [7 ]
Fenster, Aaron [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Robarts Res Inst, Imaging Res Labs, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Biomed Engn Grad Program, London, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med Imaging, London, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Ontario Canc Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Victoria, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Victoria, BC, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prostate MR image registration; Elastic model-based registration; State estimation; Finite element method; Focal ablation therapy; RIGID-BODY REGISTRATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; CANCER; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; ADENOCARCINOMA; VALIDATION; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.media.2014.12.007
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used increasingly for image-guided targeted biopsy and focal therapy of prostate cancer. In this paper, a combined rigid and deformable registration technique is proposed to register pre-treatment diagnostic 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) images of the prostate, with the identified target tumor(s), to intra-treatment 1.5 T MR images. The pre-treatment T2-weighted MR images were acquired with patients in a supine position using an endorectal coil in a 3 T scanner, while the intra-treatment T2-weighted MR images were acquired in a 1.5 T scanner before insertion of the needle with patients in the semi-lithotomy position. Both the rigid and deformable registration algorithms employ an intensity-based distance metric defined based on the modality independent neighborhood descriptors (MIND) between images. The optimization routine for estimating the rigid transformation parameters is initialized using four pairs of manually selected approximate corresponding points on the boundaries of the prostate. In this paper, the problem of deformable image registration is approached from the perspective of state estimation for dynamical systems. The registration algorithm employs a rather generic dynamic linear elastic model of the tissue deformation discretized by the finite element method (FEM). We use the model in a classical state estimation framework to estimate the deformation of the prostate based on the distance metric between pre- and intra-treatment images. Our deformable registration results using 17 sets of prostate MR images showed that the proposed method yielded a target registration error (TRE) of 1.87 +/- 0.94 mm, 2.03 +/- 0.94 mm, and 1.70 +/- 0.93 mm for the whole gland (WG), central gland (CG), and peripheral zone (PZ), respectively, using 76 manually-identified fiducial points. This was an improvement over the 2.67 +/- 1.31 mm, 2.95 +/- 1.43 mm, and 2.34 +/- 1.11 mm, respectively for the WG, CG, and PZ after rigid registration alone. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) in the WG, CG and PZ were 88.2 +/- 5.3, 85.6 +/- 7.6 and 68.7 +/- 6.9 percent, respectively. Furthermore, the mean absolute distances (MAD) between surfaces was 1.26 +/- 0.56 mm and 1.27 +/- 0.55 mm in the WG and CG, after deformable registration. These results indicate that the proposed registration technique has sufficient accuracy for localizing prostate tumors in MRI-guided targeted biopsy or focal therapy of clinically localized prostate cancer. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 103
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Incompressible Deformation Estimation Algorithm (IDEA) From Tagged MR Images
    Liu, Xiaofeng
    Abd-Elmoniem, Khaled Z.
    Stone, Maureen
    Murano, Emi Z.
    Zhuo, Jiachen
    Gullapalli, Rao P.
    Prince, Jerry L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 31 (02) : 326 - 340
  • [32] Dense deformation field estimation for brain intra-operative images registration
    De Craene, M
    d'Aische, AD
    Talos, IF
    Ferrant, M
    Black, PM
    Jolesz, F
    Kikinis, R
    Macq, B
    Warfield, SK
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2004, 5370 : 1216 - 1224
  • [33] Elastic registration for retinal images based on reconstructed vascular trees
    Fang, Bin
    Tang, Yuan Yan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (06) : 1183 - 1187
  • [34] Elastic registration algorithm of medical images based on fuzzy set
    Liu, Xingang
    Chen, Wufan
    BIOMEDICAL IMAGE REGISTRATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4057 : 214 - 221
  • [35] Elastic registration of gel electrophoresis images based on landmarks and intensities
    Rohr, K
    Cathier, R
    Wörz, S
    2004 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: MACRO TO NANO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 1451 - 1454
  • [36] Fine Registration for VHR Images Based on Superpixel Registration-Noise Estimation
    Zhu, Xianzhang
    Cao, Hui
    Zhang, Yongjun
    Tan, Kai
    Ling, Xiao
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2018, 15 (10) : 1615 - 1619
  • [37] Non-rigid registration using free-form deformation for prostate images
    Abolhassani, N
    Samani, A
    NAFIPS 2005 - 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY, 2005, : 51 - 54
  • [38] Automatic Registration of 2D MR Cine Images for Swallowing Motion Estimation
    Yang, J.
    Bahig, H.
    Mohamed, A.
    Frank, S.
    Hutcheson, K.
    Fuller, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E687 - E687
  • [39] Automatic registration of 2D MR cine images for swallowing motion estimation
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Bahig, Houda
    Ding, Yao
    Wang, Jihong
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    Lai, Stephen
    Miller, Austin
    Hutcheson, Kate A.
    Fuller, Clifton Dave
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [40] Registration of MR and CT images of the liver: comparison of voxel similarity and surface based registration algorithms
    Lee, WCC
    Tublin, ME
    Chapman, BE
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2005, 78 (02) : 101 - 114