Economic and Environmental Criteria and Trade-Offs for Recovery Processes

被引:12
|
作者
Sharma, Shivom [1 ]
Chua, Y. C. [1 ]
Rangaiah, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Multiobjective optimization; Solvent recovery; Volatile organic component; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; VOC RECOVERY; SELECTION; ALTERNATIVES; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/10426914.2010.544816
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Volatile organic component (VOC) and solvent recovery processes are two industrially important processes to limit the release of potentially harmful components into the environment. The extent of environmental contamination depends on the recovery system used for the harmful components, which indirectly contributes to the cost of process. Recently, VOC and solvent recovery systems have been optimized for multiple economic and environmental criteria such as profit before tax (PBT), net present worth (NPW), and potential environmental impact (PEI). Besides PEI, there are other aggregate environmental indicators such as IMPact Assessment of Chemical Toxics 2002+ (IMPACT), green degree (GD), and inherent environmental toxicity hazard (IETH). In this study, we consider the optimization of VOC and solvent recovery processes for PBT, NPW, PEI, IETH, GD, and IMPACT as well as their individual components as simultaneous objectives, to explore the trade-offs among them. The two processes are simulated using a commercial simulator, and then optimized using the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm in a spreadsheet along with an interface to the simulator. From the results, it can be concluded that optimization of aggregated IMPACT indicator is similar to optimization of its individual end-point damage categories. In the case of other environmental indicators, optimization for individual categories may be necessary to explore trade-offs among them.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment
    Gibson, Robert B.
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (01) : 2 - 12
  • [32] FGD options offer environmental trade-offs
    Moser, R.E.
    1600, (60)
  • [33] Towards environmental management accounting for trade-offs
    Christ, Katherine Leanne
    Burritt, Roger
    Varsei, Mohsen
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (03) : 428 - 448
  • [34] Embedded Program Specialization for Multiple Criteria Trade-offs
    Damasevicius, R.
    Stuikys, V.
    Toldinas, J.
    ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2008, (08) : 9 - 14
  • [35] Trade-offs Among System Architecture Modularity Criteria
    Sanai, Roozbeh
    Otto, Kevin
    Wood, Kristin
    Hollta-Otto, Katja
    PROCEEDINGS OF NORDDESIGN 2016, VOL 1, 2016, : 352 - 359
  • [36] Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs
    Faratin, P
    Sierra, C
    Jennings, NR
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 119 - 126
  • [37] Trade-offs
    Garland, Theodore, Jr.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : R60 - R61
  • [38] Economic-environmental trade-offs in marine aquaculture: The case of lobster farming in Vietnam
    Hai, Au Ton Nu
    Speelman, Stijn
    AQUACULTURE, 2020, 516
  • [39] Debate: Public value trade-offs and methodological trade-offs
    Bozeman, Barry
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (03) : 135 - 136
  • [40] Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs of Simultaneous Sugar and Lignin Utilization for Biobased Fuels and Chemicals
    Baral, Nawa Raj
    Banerjee, Deepanwita
    Mukhopadhyay, Aindrila
    Simmons, Blake A.
    Singer, Steven W.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 12 (07) : 2563 - 2576