Economic and Environmental Criteria and Trade-Offs for Recovery Processes

被引:12
|
作者
Sharma, Shivom [1 ]
Chua, Y. C. [1 ]
Rangaiah, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Multiobjective optimization; Solvent recovery; Volatile organic component; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; VOC RECOVERY; SELECTION; ALTERNATIVES; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/10426914.2010.544816
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Volatile organic component (VOC) and solvent recovery processes are two industrially important processes to limit the release of potentially harmful components into the environment. The extent of environmental contamination depends on the recovery system used for the harmful components, which indirectly contributes to the cost of process. Recently, VOC and solvent recovery systems have been optimized for multiple economic and environmental criteria such as profit before tax (PBT), net present worth (NPW), and potential environmental impact (PEI). Besides PEI, there are other aggregate environmental indicators such as IMPact Assessment of Chemical Toxics 2002+ (IMPACT), green degree (GD), and inherent environmental toxicity hazard (IETH). In this study, we consider the optimization of VOC and solvent recovery processes for PBT, NPW, PEI, IETH, GD, and IMPACT as well as their individual components as simultaneous objectives, to explore the trade-offs among them. The two processes are simulated using a commercial simulator, and then optimized using the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm in a spreadsheet along with an interface to the simulator. From the results, it can be concluded that optimization of aggregated IMPACT indicator is similar to optimization of its individual end-point damage categories. In the case of other environmental indicators, optimization for individual categories may be necessary to explore trade-offs among them.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Response Surface Methodology for Economic and Environmental Trade-offs at the Farm Level
    Ascough, James C., II
    Fathelrahman, Eihab M.
    Hoag, Dana L.
    AIR SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 6 : 73 - 89
  • [22] Environmental and Economic Trade-Offs in a Watershed When Using Corn Stover for Bioenergy
    Gramig, Benjamin M.
    Reeling, Carson J.
    Cibin, Raj
    Chaubey, Indrajeet
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (04) : 1784 - 1791
  • [23] Addressing Economic/Environmental Sustainability Trade-offs in Procurement Episodes with Industrial Suppliers
    Saunders, Lance W.
    Brooks, J. Paul
    Merrick, Jason R. W.
    Autry, Chad W.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 29 (05) : 1256 - 1269
  • [24] Trade-offs and Synergies between Economic and Environmental Cocoa Farm Management Decisions
    Bandanaa, Joseph
    Asante, Isaac. K.
    Egyir, Irene S.
    Annang, Ted Y.
    Blockeel, Johan
    Heidenreich, Anja
    Kadzere, Irene
    Schader, Christian
    GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2024, 8 (08)
  • [25] EXAMINATION OF TRADE-OFFS IN TEACHING ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES
    SHARP, AM
    LEFTWICH, RH
    BUMPASS, DL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1975, 7 (01): : 56 - 58
  • [26] FGD OPTIONS OFFER ENVIRONMENTAL TRADE-OFFS
    MOSER, RE
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1981, 60 (10): : 88 - 92
  • [27] Trade-offs and optimisations in continuous solids processes
    Rossiter, A.P.
    Douglas, J.M.
    Filtration and Separation, 1988, 25 (05): : 348 - 351
  • [28] Pandemics, economic freedom, and institutional trade-offs
    Vincent Geloso
    Kelly Hyde
    Ilia Murtazashvili
    European Journal of Law and Economics, 2022, 54 : 37 - 61
  • [29] Analysis of economic trade-offs in forest management
    不详
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1999, 97 (12) : A4 - A4
  • [30] Pandemics, economic freedom, and institutional trade-offs
    Geloso, Vincent
    Hyde, Kelly
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (01) : 37 - 61