Economic and Environmental Criteria and Trade-Offs for Recovery Processes

被引:12
|
作者
Sharma, Shivom [1 ]
Chua, Y. C. [1 ]
Rangaiah, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Multiobjective optimization; Solvent recovery; Volatile organic component; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; VOC RECOVERY; SELECTION; ALTERNATIVES; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/10426914.2010.544816
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Volatile organic component (VOC) and solvent recovery processes are two industrially important processes to limit the release of potentially harmful components into the environment. The extent of environmental contamination depends on the recovery system used for the harmful components, which indirectly contributes to the cost of process. Recently, VOC and solvent recovery systems have been optimized for multiple economic and environmental criteria such as profit before tax (PBT), net present worth (NPW), and potential environmental impact (PEI). Besides PEI, there are other aggregate environmental indicators such as IMPact Assessment of Chemical Toxics 2002+ (IMPACT), green degree (GD), and inherent environmental toxicity hazard (IETH). In this study, we consider the optimization of VOC and solvent recovery processes for PBT, NPW, PEI, IETH, GD, and IMPACT as well as their individual components as simultaneous objectives, to explore the trade-offs among them. The two processes are simulated using a commercial simulator, and then optimized using the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm in a spreadsheet along with an interface to the simulator. From the results, it can be concluded that optimization of aggregated IMPACT indicator is similar to optimization of its individual end-point damage categories. In the case of other environmental indicators, optimization for individual categories may be necessary to explore trade-offs among them.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MEDIATING ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY, AND ECONOMIC TRADE-OFFS
    STRAUS, DB
    [J]. ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1977, 32 (02): : 96 - 110
  • [2] DESIGN AND ECONOMIC TRADE-OFFS OF EXTRACTIVE CRYSTALLIZATION PROCESSES
    RAJAGOPAL, S
    NG, KM
    DOUGLAS, JM
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 1991, 37 (03) : 437 - 447
  • [3] Economic drivers and trade-offs in antibody purification processes
    Farid, Suzanne S.
    [J]. BIOPHARM INTERNATIONAL, 2008, : 37 - 42
  • [4] Economic Drivers and Trade-Offs in Antibody Purification Processes
    Farid, Suzanne S.
    [J]. BIOPHARM INTERNATIONAL, 2009, : 38 - 42
  • [5] Economic Drivers and Trade-Offs in Antibody Purification Processes
    Farid, Suzanne S.
    [J]. BIOPHARM INTERNATIONAL, 2009, : 37 - 42
  • [6] TRADE-OFFS AND ECONOMIC POLICY
    RAYNAULD, A
    [J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1973, 28 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [7] Economic-environmental trade-offs and the conservativeness of the upper partial moment
    Matthews, Nicolette
    Grove, Bennie
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 31 (09) : 2365 - 2377
  • [8] Quantification of environmental-economic trade-offs in nutrient management policies
    Kaye-Blake, William
    Schilling, Chris
    Monaghan, Ross
    Vibart, Ronaldo
    Dennis, Samuel
    Post, Elizabeth
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 173 : 458 - 468
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - CONFLICTS AND TRADE-OFFS
    EDMUNDS, S
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1977, 19 (03) : 5 - 11
  • [10] Economic and environmental trade-offs for Li-based battery recycling
    Gaustad, Gabrielle
    Ganter, Matt
    Wang, Xue
    Bailey, Chelsea
    Babbitt, Callie
    Landi, Brian
    [J]. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 2012: CARBON DIOXIDE MANAGEMENT AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 219 - 226