Evaluation of the Utility of Screening Mammography for High-Risk Women Undergoing Screening Breast MR Imaging

被引:54
|
作者
Lo, Glen
Scaranelo, Anabel M.
Aboras, Hana
Ghai, Sandeep
Kulkarni, Supriya
Fleming, Rachel
Bukhanov, Karina
Crystal, Pavel
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Mt Sinai Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; MUTATION CARRIERS; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2017161103
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of mammography in detecting breast cancer in high-risk women undergoing screening breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods: An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective databases was performed to identify outcomes of 3934 screening studies (1977 screening MR imaging examinations and 1957 screening mammograms) performed between January 2012 and July 2014 in 1249 high-risk women. Performance measures including recall and cancer detection rates, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging. Results: A total of 45 cancers (33 invasive and 12 ductal carcinomas in situ) were diagnosed, 43 were seen with MR imaging and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging. Additional tests ( further imaging and/or biopsy) were recommended in 461 screening MR imaging studies (recall rate, 23.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.5%, 25.2%), and mammography recalled 217 (recall rate, 11.1%; 95% CI: 9.7%, 12.6%). The cancer detection rate for MR imaging was 21.8 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 15.78, 29.19) and that for mammography was 7.2 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 3.92, 11.97; P < .001). Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were 96% and 78% respectively, and those of mammography were 31% and 89%, respectively (P < .001). Positive predictive value for MR imaging recalls was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and that for mammography recalls was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.57%, 10.59%). Conclusion: Contemporaneous screening mammography did not have added value in detection of breast cancer for women who undergo screening MR imaging. Routine use of screening mammography in women undergoing screening breast MR imaging warrants reconsideration.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Update on Screening Breast MRI in High-Risk Women
    Boetes, C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 38 (01) : 149 - +
  • [22] Is screening mammography safe for high-risk patients?
    Benson, John
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (05): : 360 - 362
  • [23] Breast density in relation to risk of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women undergoing screening mammography
    MacKenzie, Todd A.
    Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
    Vacek, Pamela M.
    Geller, Berta
    Weiss, Julia E.
    Goodrich, Martha E.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (09) : 939 - 945
  • [24] Breast density in relation to risk of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women undergoing screening mammography
    Todd A. MacKenzie
    Linda Titus-Ernstoff
    Pamela M. Vacek
    Berta Geller
    Julia E. Weiss
    Martha E. Goodrich
    Patricia A. Carney
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2007, 18 : 939 - 945
  • [25] Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Strobel, Kevin
    Bieling, Heribert
    Leutner, Claudia
    Schild, Hans H.
    Schrading, Simone
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 283 (02) : 361 - 370
  • [26] Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes among Black women undergoing screening mammography
    Tara M. Friebel-Klingner
    Sarah Ehsan
    Emily F. Conant
    Despina Kontos
    Susan M. Domchek
    Anne Marie McCarthy
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 189 : 827 - 835
  • [27] Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes among Black women undergoing screening mammography
    Friebel-Klingner, Tara M.
    Ehsan, Sarah
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    Domchek, Susan M.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 189 (03) : 827 - 835
  • [28] Results of MR Imaging Screening for Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients with Lobular Carcinoma in Situ
    Friedlander, Lauren C.
    Roth, Susan Orel
    Gavenonis, Sara C.
    RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (02) : 421 - 427
  • [29] Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
    Niell, Bethany L.
    Augusto, Bianca
    McIntyre, McKenzie
    Conley, Claire C.
    Gerke, Travis
    Roetzheim, Richard
    Garcia, Jennifer
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [30] Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) Preparation for High-Risk Screening
    Hugg, J. W.
    Wagenaar, D. J.
    Moats, R. A.
    Weinmann, A.
    O'Connor, M. K.
    Hruska, C. B.
    Chowdhury, S.
    Patt, B. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S359 - S359