Evaluation of the Utility of Screening Mammography for High-Risk Women Undergoing Screening Breast MR Imaging

被引:54
|
作者
Lo, Glen
Scaranelo, Anabel M.
Aboras, Hana
Ghai, Sandeep
Kulkarni, Supriya
Fleming, Rachel
Bukhanov, Karina
Crystal, Pavel
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Mt Sinai Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; MUTATION CARRIERS; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2017161103
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of mammography in detecting breast cancer in high-risk women undergoing screening breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods: An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective databases was performed to identify outcomes of 3934 screening studies (1977 screening MR imaging examinations and 1957 screening mammograms) performed between January 2012 and July 2014 in 1249 high-risk women. Performance measures including recall and cancer detection rates, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging. Results: A total of 45 cancers (33 invasive and 12 ductal carcinomas in situ) were diagnosed, 43 were seen with MR imaging and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging. Additional tests ( further imaging and/or biopsy) were recommended in 461 screening MR imaging studies (recall rate, 23.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.5%, 25.2%), and mammography recalled 217 (recall rate, 11.1%; 95% CI: 9.7%, 12.6%). The cancer detection rate for MR imaging was 21.8 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 15.78, 29.19) and that for mammography was 7.2 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 3.92, 11.97; P < .001). Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were 96% and 78% respectively, and those of mammography were 31% and 89%, respectively (P < .001). Positive predictive value for MR imaging recalls was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and that for mammography recalls was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.57%, 10.59%). Conclusion: Contemporaneous screening mammography did not have added value in detection of breast cancer for women who undergo screening MR imaging. Routine use of screening mammography in women undergoing screening breast MR imaging warrants reconsideration.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging
    Madeleine M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst
    Inge Marie M. Obdeijn
    Karina C.M. Bartels
    Harry J. de Koning
    Matthijs Oudkerk
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2000, 63 : 53 - 60
  • [12] First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging
    Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA
    Obdeijn, IMM
    Bartels, KCM
    de Koning, HJ
    Oudkerk, M
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2000, 63 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [13] Comparison of combined mammography-ultrasound use and mammography alone in breast cancer screening in high-risk women
    Berg, W. A.
    Blume, J. D.
    Cormack, J. B.
    Mendelson, E. B.
    Lehrer, D.
    Bohmvelez, M.
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2008, 18 (04) : 285 - 286
  • [14] Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Ascher, Susan M.
    Weatherall, Paul T.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Tomlinson, Gail
    Skates, Steven J.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (02) : 381 - 388
  • [15] Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography
    Barlow, William E.
    White, Emily
    Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
    Vacek, Pamela M.
    Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Geller, Berta M.
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17): : 1204 - 1214
  • [16] Screening performance of ultrasonography and mammography among Chinese women at high-risk of developing breast cancer
    Huang, Yubei
    Song, Fengju
    Chen, Kexin
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [17] Pilot study of breast MR screening of a high-risk cohort
    Lo, LD
    Rosen, MA
    Schnall, MD
    Orel, SG
    Cruz, EL
    Weber, B
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 432 - 432
  • [18] Update on Screening Breast MRI in High-Risk Women
    Boetes, C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 18 (02) : 241 - +
  • [19] Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women
    Rahman, W. Tania
    Helvie, Mark A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 83 : 3 - 14
  • [20] An Imaging Approach to High-Risk Screening for Breast Cancer
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 46 (01) : 68 - 75