Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

被引:96
|
作者
Komori, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol Neuropathol, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 1830042, Japan
关键词
DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; BRAIN-TUMORS; IDH; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; ASTROCYTOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; 1P/19Q;
D O I
10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted new molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, i.e., the CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, as independent molecular markers of the highest grade. The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical updates on gliomas and implications of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Shi, Yixin
    Liu, Delin
    Li, Yilin
    Chen, Wenlin
    Wang, Yaning
    Wang, Yuekun
    Xing, Hao
    Xia, Yu
    Li, Junlin
    Wu, Jiaming
    Liang, Tingyu
    Wang, Hai
    Liu, Qianshu
    Jin, Shanmu
    Qu, Tian
    Guo, Siying
    Li, Huanzhang
    Yang, Tianrui
    Zhang, Kun
    Wang, Yu
    Ma, Wenbin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [42] Letter regarding Louis et al: The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary
    Moudgil-Joshi, Jigishaa
    Kaliaperumal, Chandrasekaran
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (12) : 2120 - 2121
  • [43] Letter to the Editor: "The Neurosurgical Perspective for the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Missed Opportunity?"
    Armocida, Daniele
    Pesce, Alessandro
    Santoro, Antonio
    Salvati, Maurizio
    Frati, Alessandro
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 155 : 203 - 204
  • [44] From Theory to Practice: Implementing the WHO 2021 Classification of Adult Diffuse Gliomas in Neuropathology Diagnosis
    Martin, Karina Chornenka
    Ma, Crystal
    Yip, Stephen
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [45] Neuroimaging of pediatric tumors of the sellar region-A review in light of the 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system
    Maia, Ruben
    Miranda, Andre
    Geraldo, Ana Filipa
    Sampaio, Luisa
    Ramaglia, Antonia
    Tortora, Domenico
    Severino, Mariasavina
    Rossi, Andrea
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [46] The 2021 WHO classification of tumors, 5th edition, central nervous system tumors: the 10 basic principles
    Takashi Komori
    Brain Tumor Pathology, 2022, 39 : 47 - 50
  • [47] The 2021 WHO classification of tumors, 5th edition, central nervous system tumors: the 10 basic principles
    Komori, Takashi
    BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY, 2022, 39 (02) : 47 - 50
  • [48] Comment on "Sex as a prognostic factor in adult-type diffuse gliomas: an integrated clinical and molecular analysis according to 2021 WHO classification"
    Usuzaki, Takuma
    Takahashi, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 161 (01) : 189 - 190
  • [49] 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system: a review for the neuroradiologist
    McNamara, Cillian
    Mankad, Kshitij
    Thust, Stefanie
    Dixon, Luke
    Limback-Stanic, Clara
    D'Arco, Felice
    Jacques, Thomas S.
    Lobel, Ulrike
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (10) : 1919 - 1950
  • [50] 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system: a review for the neuroradiologist
    Cillian McNamara
    Kshitij Mankad
    Stefanie Thust
    Luke Dixon
    Clara Limback-Stanic
    Felice D’Arco
    Thomas S. Jacques
    Ulrike Löbel
    Neuroradiology, 2022, 64 : 1919 - 1950