Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

被引:96
|
作者
Komori, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol Neuropathol, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 1830042, Japan
关键词
DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; BRAIN-TUMORS; IDH; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; ASTROCYTOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; 1P/19Q;
D O I
10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted new molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, i.e., the CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, as independent molecular markers of the highest grade. The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system
    Figarella-Branger, Dominique
    Appay, Romain
    Metais, Alice
    Tauziede-Espariat, Arnault
    Colin, Carole
    Rousseau, Audrey
    Varlet, Pascale
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2022, 42 (05) : 367 - 382
  • [22] The 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors: what neurologists need to know
    Jamshidi, Pouya
    Brat, Daniel J. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 35 (06) : 764 - 771
  • [23] 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: Pre-test answers
    Rousseau, Audrey
    Figarella-Branger, Dominique
    Varlet, Pascale
    Bielle, Franck
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2022, 42 (05) : 363 - 366
  • [24] 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Pre-testing
    Rousseau, Audrey
    Figarella-Branger, Dominique
    Varlet, Pascale
    Bielle, Franck
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2022, 42 (05) : 356 - 362
  • [25] Clinical Laboratory Testing Practices in Diffuse Gliomas Prior to Publication of 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors
    Ramkissoon, Shakti H.
    Fernandes, Helen
    Lopez-Terrada, Dolores H.
    Hameed, Meera R.
    Trembath, Dimitri G.
    Bridge, Julia A.
    Lindeman, Neal I.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Vasalos, Patricia
    Brat, Daniel J.
    Moncur, Joel T.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 147 (05) : 518 - 524
  • [26] The 2016 revision of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours: retrospective application to a cohort of diffuse gliomas
    Te Whiti Rogers
    Gurvinder Toor
    Katharine Drummond
    Craig Love
    Kathryn Field
    Rebecca Asher
    Alpha Tsui
    Michael Buckland
    Michael Gonzales
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 137 : 181 - 189
  • [27] The 2016 revision of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours: retrospective application to a cohort of diffuse gliomas
    Rogers, Te Whiti
    Toor, Gurvinder
    Drummond, Katharine
    Love, Craig
    Field, Kathryn
    Asher, Rebecca
    Tsui, Alpha
    Buckland, Michael
    Gonzales, Michael
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 137 (01) : 181 - 189
  • [28] Daily management of gliomas, glioneuronal, and neuronal tumors in the era of the 2021 WHO classification of nervous tumors
    Mlika, Mona
    Mokni, Moncef
    Mezni, Faouzi
    Rammeh, Soumeya
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [29] A Radiologist's Guide to the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System Tumor Classification: Part I-Key Concepts and the Spectrum of Diffuse Gliomas
    Johnson, Derek R.
    Giannini, Caterina
    Vaubel, Rachael A.
    Morris, Jonathan M.
    Eckel, Laurence J.
    Kaufmann, Timothy J.
    Guerin, Julie B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (03) : 494 - 508
  • [30] Updating the grading criteria for adult diffuse gliomas: beyond the WHO2016CNS classification
    Takashi Komori
    Brain Tumor Pathology, 2020, 37 : 1 - 4