Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

被引:96
|
作者
Komori, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol Neuropathol, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 1830042, Japan
关键词
DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; BRAIN-TUMORS; IDH; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; ASTROCYTOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; 1P/19Q;
D O I
10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted new molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, i.e., the CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, as independent molecular markers of the highest grade. The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Update of the 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: adult diffuse gliomas
    Komori, Takashi
    BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY, 2023, 40 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [2] Update of the 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: adult diffuse gliomas
    Takashi Komori
    Brain Tumor Pathology, 2023, 40 : 1 - 3
  • [3] WES data from 286 diffuse gliomas under the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System
    Zheng Zhao
    Ke-Nan Zhang
    Zhiyan Sun
    Changlin Yang
    Qiangwei Wang
    Guanzhang Li
    Zhiliang Wang
    Fan Zeng
    Ruichao Chai
    Zenghui Qian
    Zheng Wang
    Yanwei Liu
    Wenping Ma
    Fan Wu
    Tao Jiang
    Scientific Data, 9
  • [4] The WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system 2021 Changes in the diagnostics of diffuse gliomas and implications for clinical practice
    Weller, Michael
    Knobbe-Thomsen, Christiane B.
    Le Rhun, Emilie
    Reifenberger, Guido
    ONKOLOGE, 2022, 28 (02): : 155 - 163
  • [5] WES data from 286 diffuse gliomas under the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System
    Zhao, Zheng
    Zhang, Ke-Nan
    Sun, Zhiyan
    Yang, Changlin
    Wang, Qiangwei
    Li, Guanzhang
    Wang, Zhiliang
    Zeng, Fan
    Chai, Ruichao
    Qian, Zenghui
    Wang, Zheng
    Liu, Yanwei
    Ma, Wenping
    Wu, Fan
    Jiang, Tao
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of IDH testing in diffuse gliomas according to the 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system recommendations
    DeWitt, John C.
    Jordan, Justin T.
    Frosch, Matthew P.
    Samore, Wesley R.
    Iafrate, A. John
    Louis, David N.
    Lennerz, Jochen K.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (12) : 1640 - 1650
  • [7] The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary
    Louis, David N.
    Perry, Arie
    Wesseling, Pieter
    Brat, Daniel J.
    Cree, Ian A.
    Figarella-Branger, Dominique
    Hawkins, Cynthia
    Ng, H. K.
    Pfister, Stefan M.
    Reifenberger, Guido
    Soffietti, Riccardo
    von Deimling, Andreas
    Ellison, David W.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (08) : 1231 - 1251
  • [8] The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: An update on pediatric low-grade gliomas and glioneuronal tumors
    Bale, Tejus A.
    Rosenblum, Marc K.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04)
  • [9] Adult type diffuse gliomas in the new 2021 WHO Classification
    Antonelli, Manila
    Poliani, Pietro Luigi
    PATHOLOGICA, 2022, 114 (06) : 397 - 409
  • [10] The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: clinical implications
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Packer, Roger J.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (08) : 1215 - 1217