Efficiency and Fairness in Unmanned Air Traffic Flow Management

被引:22
|
作者
Chin, Christopher [1 ]
Gopalakrishnan, Karthik [1 ]
Egorov, Maxim [2 ]
Evans, Antony [2 ]
Balakrishnan, Hamsa [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Airbus UTM, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Delays; Aircraft; Trajectory; Measurement; Airports; Vehicle dynamics; Drones; Air transportation; Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS); UAS Traffic Management (UTM); traffic flow management; fairness; efficiency;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2020.3048356
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As the demand for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operations increases, UAS Traffic Flow Management (UTFM) initiatives are needed to mitigate congestion, and to ensure safety and efficiency. Congestion mitigation can be achieved by assigning airborne delays (through speed changes or path stretches) or ground delays (holds relative to the desired takeoff times) to aircraft. While the assignment of such delays may increase system efficiency, individual aircraft operators may be unfairly impacted. Dynamic traffic demand, variability in aircraft operator preferences, and differences in the market share of operators complicate the issue of fairness in UTFM. Our work considers the fairness of delay assignment in the context of UTFM. To this end, we formulate the UTFM problem with fairness and show through computational experiments that significant improvements in fairness can be attained at little cost to system efficiency. We demonstrate that when operators are not aligned in how they perceive or value fairness, there is a decrease in the overall fairness of the solution. We find that fairness decreases as the air-ground delay cost ratio increases and that it improves when the operator with dominant market share has a weak preference for the fairness of its allocated delays. Finally, we implemented UTFM in a rolling-horizon setting with dynamic traffic demand, and find that efficiency is adversely impacted. However, the impact on fairness is varied and depends on the metric used.
引用
收藏
页码:5939 / 5951
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Air traffic flow management with heuristic repair
    Junker, Ulrich
    KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2012, 27 (03): : 333 - 342
  • [22] A distributed scheduler for air traffic flow management
    Steven J. Landry
    Todd Farley
    Ty Hoang
    Brian Stein
    Journal of Scheduling, 2012, 15 : 537 - 551
  • [23] Achieving balance between economic efficiency and user fairness in traffic rate management
    Pan, Lian
    Wang, Hanwu
    Li, Hexin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 33 (18)
  • [24] Traffic efficiency and fairness optimisation for autonomous intersection management based on reinforcement learning
    Wu, Yuanyuan
    Wang, David Z. W.
    Zhu, Feng
    TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE, 2025, 21 (01) : 247 - 271
  • [25] An Unmanned Aerial Traffic Management Solution for Cities Using an Air Parcel Model
    Foina, Aislan Gomide
    Krainer, Clemens
    Sengupta, Raja
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS'15), 2015, : 1295 - 1300
  • [26] SkyTrakx: A Toolkit for Simulation and Verification of Unmanned Air-Traffic Management Systems
    Hsieh, Chiao
    Sibai, Hussein
    Taylor, Hebron
    Ni, Yifeng
    Mitra, Sayan
    2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, : 372 - 379
  • [27] Continuous adjoint method for air traffic flow management
    Strub, Issarn S.
    Bayen, Alexandre M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 101 - 106
  • [28] Aggregate flow model for air-traffic management
    Sridhar, Banavar
    Soni, Tarun
    Sheth, Kapil
    Chatterji, Gano B.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2006, 29 (04) : 992 - 997
  • [29] A Parallel Computing Framework for Air Traffic Flow Management
    Cao, Yi
    Sun, Dengfeng
    2011 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2011, : 2771 - 2776
  • [30] Swarm theory applied to air traffic flow management
    Torres, Sergio
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS 2012, 2012, 12 : 463 - 470